13位科学家实名呼吁对韩春雨启动调查：为了中国学界的名声

smilingcloud

《知识分子》
编者按：
       自5月2日韩春雨作为通讯作者的“基因编辑技术NgAgo”论文发表引起关注、5月底质疑的声音开始出现，韩春雨实验的可重复争议，不仅科学界议论纷纷，在社会层面也引发了相关讨论，也有不少读者就此事向《知识分子》留言询问。因谨慎起见，《知识分子》未在确定结果出现前再发表相关文章，但始终在关注事件进展。今天，我们刊发饶毅、邵峰就韩春雨研究致信河北科技大学校长始末及信件内容。
       为何公开这封信？在经网络传播和发酵后，韩春雨实验的可重复问题已演变为重大学术争议，是中国科研界令人瞩目的一件大事，可能影响中国学术生态。饶毅、邵峰在多次与校方沟通收效甚微的情况下，选择公开信件，以推动科学共同体认真对待这一中国学术生态节点性事件，确保科学研究成果的严肃性。

smilingcloud

https://publons.com/review/48254 ... ter#482541-comments

It seems to me that the NgAgo enzyme needs to be heated over 50ºC to function, which is in direct contradiction to the Han’s paper. My take on all these failed experiments trying to reproduce Han’s paper is basically the incubation temperature of the cells is too low for the enzyme to function or the enzyme/5' phosphorylated oligo complex is raidly degraded within the cells explaining possibly why nobody has been able to reproduce Han’s experiment. NgAgo may or may not have an endonuclease activity creating a double strand break but under so specific conditions that are almost impossible to reproduce and too restrictive for a broad use of this system if this is real.

Additionally I do have some serious doubt on NgAgo over its endonuclease activity.

Nature Biotechnology should ask Han to release all his raw data + experimental condition to the public. This is a duty of care from the journal.

I think rather than to chase high impact publications and be secretive, we should be more open and share our results to avoid everyone wasting their time on results that are irreproducible and pointless. In my opinion this is the way Science should work.

MP4

刚收到回信谈何多次？
想发动文革哪里有这么容易。

MP4

老王卖麻花 发表于 2016-10-12 17:01
装逼MP4，真是牛逼啊。  饶毅大科学家和邵峰院士说【多次与校方沟通】，你个贱货MP4就跳出来【不是多次沟 ...

多次联系联系不上也是他们写的呢。
日本研究所是法院？判了什么罪，蹲了多少天？
你上日本网站然后告诉广大群众啊，智商
哪些研究人员都不可以代表世界

MP4

老王卖麻花 发表于 2016-10-12 17:13
【人家只是质疑】

贱货MP4你是人格分裂么？   

“”怎么这次全世界生物领域的研究人员都质疑韩骗子的时候，你选择站在韩骗子一边。“”




你自己写的，质疑，怪我咯