- 现金
- 10708 元
- 精华
- 8
- 帖子
- 11567
- 注册时间
- 2009-7-16
- 最后登录
- 2021-2-24
|
Tenofovir. 对e抗原阳性病人
Tenofovir, an acyclic nucleotide analog with a molecular structure related to that of
adefovir, is currently approved bothonly for the treatment of HIV infection and for HBV
infection, but it also has been shown to haveand was known prior to licensure for the treatment
of CHB to have potent activity against HBV.96,97 Data from several small studies suggest that
tenofovir may be more potent than adefovir in inducing the early and rapid suppression of HBV
DNA in both HBeAg-positive and -negative patients.96,97,116 Limited clinical data suggest its
efficacy in treating lamivudine-resistant patients.96,97,116 In a small study that compared the
antiviral activity of tenofovir with that of adefovir in lamivudine-resistant patients, the tenofovir
group achieved potent and rapid suppression of HBV DNA within weeks of treatment initiation
as compared with a less-consistent pattern of suppression in patients treated with adefovir.97 At
48 weeks, significantly more patients treated with tenofovir had a reduction of HBV DNA levels
to <105 copies/mL than did patients treated with adefovir (100% vs. 44%). A follow-up study
confirmed the superiority of tenofovir over adefovir in this setting.96
Preliminary results from a multicenter, randomized, phase III trial comparing the safety and
efficacy of tenofovir and adefovir in patients with HBeAg-positive CHB have been reported
(Table 5).98 A total of 266 patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive tenofovir 300 mg or
adefovir 10 mg for 48 weeks. The primary end point of this study was complete response at week
48, defined as HBV DNA levels of <400 copies/mL and histologic improvement, defined as a
≥2-point reduction in Knodell inflammatory score without worsening of fibrosis. At 48 weeks,
67% of patients in the tenofovir arm achieved a complete response compared with 12% of
patients in the adefovir arm (P <0.001). A higher proportion of patients in the tenofovir arm than
in the adefovir arm achieved undetectable HBV DNA levels at week 48 (<400 copies/mL: 76%
vs. 13%). The respective rates for ALT normalization were 69% vs. 54% and for HBeAg
seroconversion were 21% vs. 18%. A higher proportion of patients treated with tenofovir had
HBsAg loss (3.2% vs. 0%) and HBsAg seroconversion (1.3% vs. 0%). The incidence of grade 2
to 4 adverse events was similar in the tenofovir and adefovir arms. No patients taking tenofovir
experienced a 0.5-mg increase in serum creatinine levels or creatinine clearance of <50 mL/min
(possible indicators of renal toxicity, which has been associated with tenofovir in some studies of
patients with HIV infection) compared with 1% of patients taking adefovir. As with adefovir
therapy, new onset or worsening renal impairment may occur, and it is recommended that
baseline calculated creatinine clearance be obtained and creatinine clearance and serum
phosphorus be monitored in patients at risk during therapy. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 ALT
flares 2 × the baseline values were greater in the tenofovir arm than in the adefovir arm (11% vs.
4%). All patients taking tenofovir who did not achieve HBV DNA levels of <400 copies/mL by
week 48 or who experienced viral breakthrough while receiving treatment underwent genotypic
resistance testing. The clinical benefits of tenofovir with respect to suppression of serum HBV
DNA levels below the level of detection (79%) and ALT normalization (77%) were maintained
through 72 weeks of treatment.117 The rate of HBsAg loss and seroconversion increased from 3%
to 5% and from 1% to 2%, respectively, at weeks 48 and 64 in patients in the tenofovir arm
whereas no increase in HBsAg loss was observed among patients in the adefovir arm. No
mutations associated with tenofovir resistance were identified at weeks 48 or 72. |
|