- 现金
- 62111 元
- 精华
- 26
- 帖子
- 30437
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-5
- 最后登录
- 2022-12-28
|
Views on stopping nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B
Issam Tout 1 , Pietro Lampertico 2 , Thomas Berg 3 , Tarik Asselah 4
Affiliations
Affiliations
1
University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CRI, UMR 1149, Inserm, F-75018 Paris, France; Department of Hepatology, AP-HP Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy 92110, France.
2
Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CRC "A. M. and A. Migliavacca" Center for Liver Disease, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
3
Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
4
University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CRI, UMR 1149, Inserm, F-75018 Paris, France; Department of Hepatology, AP-HP Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy 92110, France. Electronic address: [email protected].
PMID: 33279523 DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104992
Abstract
Long-term treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) is the current first line therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), recommended by most of the current guidelines. NAs prevent disease progression, liver failure, decrease the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and have favorable safety profiles. However, low rates of on-therapy functional cure (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] loss), which is regarded as the optimal end point, prevent many patients from stopping NA therapy with the need for a lifelong treatment. The higher likelihood of HBsAg loss associated with stopping as compared to continuing NAs has got a lot of attention lately. Recommendations regarding endpoints allowing for safely stopping NA therapy differ between the different international guidelines. Whereas in HBeAg-positive patients, HBeAg seroconversion with at least one year of consolidation therapy is an accepted endpoint of treatment, the recommendations for HBeAg-negative ones differ. Some guidelines propose ≥ 3 years of HBV DNA undetectability to stop NA while others regard HBsAg loss as the only acceptable endpoint to therapy. Stopping NA can lead to substantial rates of virologic relapses and consequent ALT flares in some of them. Moreover, no reliable predictor(s) of post-NA relapses have been identified so far. Quantitative HBsAg is becoming an increasingly promising marker to predict safe NA cessation. On the other hand, investigating the role of the immune system in mediating sustained virologic responses after NA withdrawal is needed to suggest immunological biomarkers to safely stop NA. In this article, we will review relevant literature regarding NA stopping rules and discuss promising viral and immunological biomarkers to predict antiviral responses and thus to help identify patients who are more likely to achieve HBsAg seroclearance.
Keywords: HBV infection; NA discontinuation; Quantitative HBsAg; immune control; relapse.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V. |
|