- 现金
- 62111 元
- 精华
- 26
- 帖子
- 30437
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-5
- 最后登录
- 2022-12-28
|
772
SAFETY AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF HEPLISAV-B IN
PREGNANCY
Tatyana Kushner1, John Youhanna2, Robert Walker2, Kimberly
Erby2 and Robert S. Janssen3, (1)Division of Liver Diseases,
Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, (2)Dynavax
Technologies, (3)Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Background: HEPLISAV-B® [hepatitis B vaccine
(recombinant), adjuvanted] has recently been approved for
use in adults age 18 and over HEPLISAV-B was evaluated in
11 clinical trials, 7 of which were head-to-head comparisons
to Engerix-B® HEPLISAV-B demonstrated statistically
significantly higher seroprotection rates (SPRs), and similar
safety However, there are no published data available
regarding the safety and immunogenicity of HEPLISAV-B
during pregnancy As pregnancy was an exclusion criterion
for trial enrollment, we evaluated outcomes in women
who became pregnant during participation in the clinical
development program Methods: Retrospective analysis of
women enrolled in the HEPLISAV-B clinical trials who had
pregnancy documented during trial participation and follow up
The last menstrual period (LMP) recorded was compared to
timing of last dose of vaccine. Seroprotection was defined as
anti-HBs≥10mIU/mL and confidence intervals were calculated
using the Clopper Pearson method Results:: Among 7340
female subjects enrolled, we identified pregnancies in
40/5145 (0 78%) women who received HEPLISAV-B and in
19/2195 (0 87%) who received Engerix-B Among pregnant
women in both groups, median age (30 5 versus 31 0),
race (73% versus 63% white; 20% versus 26 3% black),
and ethnicity (12 5% versus 10 5% Hispanic), were similar
Median time from last HBV vaccine dose to last menstrual
period (LMP) was 81 days (Interquartile Range, IQR: 30, 219)
in HEPLISAV-B recipients and 42 days (IQR: 14, 98) in the
Engerix-B arms Seroprotection rates were 28/28 (100%; 95%
CI: 87 7%-100 0%) at 24 weeks of follow-up for HEPLISAV-B
versus 8/14 (57 1%; 95% CI: 28 9%-82 3%) at 28 weeks in
the Engerix-B arms In the HEPLISAV group, peak anti-HBs
levels were ≥ 10 IU/L and < 100 IU/L in 4/40 (10%) subjects
and ≥100 in 34/40 (85%), compared to 4/19 (21%) and 10/19
(53%), respectively, in the Engerix-B arms 2 (5%) in the
HEPLISAV-B arm versus 7 (37%) in the Engerix-B arms were
vaccine non-responders (i e peak recorded anti-HBs level
<10 IU/L) Rates of pregnancy outcomes included 24 (60%)
versus 11 (55%) healthy term deliveries, 3 (7 5%) vs 2 (10%)
spontaneous abortions, 1 (2 5%) versus 1 (5%) congenital
anomaly, 2(5%) versus 2 (10%) elective terminations, 2 (5 0%)
versus 0 preterm deliveries, and 1(2 5%) versus 0 stillbirths,
in the HEPLISAV-B versus the Engerix-B arms (see Figure
1 for data on outcomes and peak HBsAg titers in all women
with available LMP data) Conclusion: These data from the
clinical development program show HEPLISAV-B in pregnant
women to induce higher rates of immunogenicity over a
shorter dosing regimen with similar fetal outcomes compared
with Engerix-B. These results should be further verified with
additional studies or data to confirm the safety and efficacy of
HEPLISAV-B in pregnant women.
|
|