- 现金
- 62111 元
- 精华
- 26
- 帖子
- 30437
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-5
- 最后登录
- 2022-12-28
|
2108
The Relationship between Serum HBV RNA
Levels and Other Viral Markers in the Natural
History of Chronic HBV Infection
Umaporn Limothai1, Natthaya Chuaypen1, Yong Poovorawan2
and Pisit Tangkijvanich1, (1)Center of Excellence in Hepatitis
and Liver Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn
University, (2)Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty
of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA quantification is
a novel serum marker reflecting the activity of intrahepatic
covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). The aim of this
study was to examine the relationship between serum HBV
RNA and other viral markers in different phases of the natural
history of chronic HBV infection. Methods: Serum HBV
markers at initial presentation of 423 treatment-naïve patients
were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into
4 groups based on the AASLD guideline as following: phase
1; Immune-tolerant phase (N=47), phase 2; HBeAg-positive
immune-active phase (N=91), phase 3; Inactive CHB phase
(N=158) and phase 4; HBeAg-negative immune reactivation
phase (N=127). Serum HBV RNA was quantified by a droplet
digital PCR amplification. Results: Serum levels of HBV
DNA, HBV RNA and HBsAg were lowest in phase 3 and
highest in phase 1. The mean levels of serum HBV RNA in the
respective 4 phases were 6.70±0.68, 6.44±1.78, 2.14±0.65
and 3.45±1.46 (log10 copies/ml). Serum HBV RNA levels
were positively correlated with serum HBV DNA in phase 1
(Pearson, r=0.586, P<0.001), phase 2 (r=0.475, P<0.001)
and phase 4 (r=0.771, P<0.001) but not in phase 3 (r=0.090,
P=0.262). The correlations between serum HBV RNA and
HBsAg were found only in phase 1 (r=0.536, P<0.001) and
phase 2 (r=0.438, P<0.001). Among patients undergoing liver
biopsy, the data showed that serum HBV RNA correlated with
intrahepatic cccDNA in phase 2 (n=20, r=0.499, P=0.025) and
in phase 4 (r=0.338, P=0.004). However, serum HBsAg levels
correlated with intrahepatic cccDNA only in phase 2 (r=0.456,
P=0.043) but not in phase 4 (r=0.049, P=0.685). Conclusion:
Serum HBV RNA levels varied among different phases of
chronic HBV infection. Compared with HBsAg quantification,
serum HBV RNA levels exhibited a better surrogate serum
marker reflecting the amount of intrahepatic cccDNA.
These findings suggest that serum HBV RNA quantification
represents a useful marker for disease monitoring in patients
with chronic HBV infection. |
|