- 现金
- 62111 元
- 精华
- 26
- 帖子
- 30437
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-5
- 最后登录
- 2022-12-28
|
537
A New Marker to Identify ‘True’ Functional Cure-
Is HBsAg Loss Truly HBsAg Loss?
Ivana Carey, Matthew Bruce, Bo Wang, Kathryn Oakes,
Geoffrey M. Dusheiko and Kosh Agarwal, Institute of Liver
Studies, King’s College Hospital
Background: Functional cure in chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
is defined as a loss of HBsAg, non-detected HBV DNA and
absence of ongoing liver damage. Some patients achieve
HBsAg seroconversion – the presence of anti-HBsAg
antibodies (anti-HBs Ab) > 10 mIU/ml, but this is not a ‘gold
standard’ for ‘functional’ cure definition. Newer, more sensitive,
assays allow quantification of HBsAg to lower detection limits
and this may provide insight into resolution of infection in HBV.
Aim: To measure HBsAg levels using an ultrasensitive HBsAg
assay in CHB patients who achieved HBsAg loss and assess
whether there is any relationship between HBsAg and anti-
HBs Ab levels. Methods: Serum samples from 66 patients
(median age 45.7 years, 35 males) with history of HBsAg
positivity (median duration of total follow-up since diagnosis
7.5 years), and currently HBsAg negative by qualitative Abbott
ArchitectTM Assay (LOQ 0.01 IU/ml) with non-detected HBV
DNA (Cobas TaqMan; LOQ < 20 IU/ml) were collected. Levels
of HBsAg were measured by CLEIA Lumipulse HBsAg-HQ
(Fujirebio) (LOQ 0.5 mIU/ml). Concentrations of anti-HBs
Ab were determined by Abbott ArchitectTM (LOQ 0.1 mIU/
ml). HBsAg levels were stratified according to anti-HBs Ab
concentrations: 41 patients had anti-HBs Ab <10 mIU/ml vs.
25 patients with anti-HBsAg Ab ≥10 mIU/ml. Within this cohort,
23 patients had sequential plasma samples from the timepoint
of HBsAg negativity (median duration 1.5 year, range
0.9 – 5.2 years). Results: 62 out of 66 (94%) patients had
detected HBsAg by ultrasensitive HBsAg assay. All patients
(n=4) with non- detected ultrasensitive HBsAg had anti-HBs
Ab levels > 250 mIU/ml. Patients with low concentrations of
anti-HBs Ab (<10 mIU/ml) had higher ultrasensitive HBsAg
levels than patients with anti-HBs Ab ≥ 10 mIU/ml (median,
range HBsAg: 3.2 (0.8 – 77.9) vs. 0.6 (0-2.3) mIU/ml, p<0.01).
There was a strong inverse correlation between ultrasensitive
HBsAg levels and anti-HBs Ab concentrations (r=-0.61,
p<0.01). In 23 patients with sequential samples from anti-
HBs loss, the levels of ultrasensitive HBsAg were higher and
anti-HBs Ab concentrations were lower at the initial qualitative
HBsAg negativity time-point than in consecutive follow up
visit (median 1.5 year) (median HBsAg: 43 vs. 1.2 mIU/ml,
p<0.01; median anti-HBs Ab: 1.09 vs. 169 mIU/ml, p<0.01).
Conclusion: Ultrasensitive HBsAg assay may be a useful
tool to determine HBsAg levels in patients who achieve
HBsAg loss (by qualitative assay) and demonstrated dynamic
changes in conjunction with anti-HBs antibodies levels.
This marker may be an important adjunct in the context of
‘consolidation’ in HBV cure programs. |
|