- 现金
- 62111 元
- 精华
- 26
- 帖子
- 30441
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-5
- 最后登录
- 2022-12-28
|
Management of Hepatitis B Infection - Authors: Harry L. A. Janssen, MD, PhD; Milan J. Sonneveld, MSc (More Info)
- Editor In Chief: Stefan Zeuzem, MD
- Last Reviewed: 2/24/17 (What's New)
Monitoring Patient Response to Nucleos(t)ide Analogues Summary - Persistent viral replication during nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy is a major risk factor for development of antiviral resistance[Zeuzem 2009; Hadziyannis 2006; Liaw 2009b; Yuen 2001]
- EASL guidelines recommend monitoring HBV DNA levels at least every 3-6 months with a sensitive assay (lower limit of detection of newest assays is < 20 IU/mL) in patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues;[EASL HBV] AASLD guidelines recommend monitoring every 3 months until HBV DNA is undetectable, and every 3-6 months after that[Terrault 2016]; APASL guidelines recommend monitoring at Month 3 and 6 and then at regular intervals, depending on genetic barrier to resistance of the nucleos(t)de analogue used
- Complete virologic responders are patients who accomplish undetectable levels of HBV DNA within 48 weeks of therapy
- Primary nonresponders are patients who fail to achieve ≥ 1 log10 IU/mL drop in HBV DNA levels by 3 months after commencing therapy
- Partial response is defined as an on-treatment decline in HBV DNA of ≥ 1 log10 IU/mL but failure to achieve undetectable HBV DNA levels at Week 24 (for lamivudine and telbivudine) or Week 48 (for adefovir, entecavir, and tenofovir DF)
- Virologic breakthrough is defined as an increase in serum HBV DNA > 1 log10 above nadir after achieving a virologic response during continued treatment[EASL HBV; Terrault 2016]
- According to international guidelines, patients with a suboptimal response to nucleos(t)ide analogues at predefined time points are eligible for treatment modification
- Evidence supports treatment modification in patients with persistent viremia during therapy with lamivudine, telbivudine, and adefovir
- It is unclear whether treatment modification will improve results for nonresponders or partial responders to entecavir or tenofovir DF (detectable HBV DNA at Week 96).
- Prolongation of therapy may be considered in patients treated with these agents where HBV DNA is declining
Adherence to Nucleos(t)ide Analogues- Medication adherence is an important factor for success of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy
- Adherence should be reviewed in patients with virologic breakthrough on therapy and the presence of antiviral resistance confirmed with genotypic testing[Terrault 2016]
Currently approved nucleos(t)ide analogues can adequately suppress HBV DNA levels, normalize alanine aminotransferase levels, and improve liver histology,[Dienstag 2009;Marcellin 2013] but their antiviral efficacy is markedly reduced in patients who develop drug-resistant hepatitis B virus variants, resulting in virologic breakthrough, hepatitis flares, and a reduction in clinical benefits.[Liaw 2004] Averting emergence of viral resistance is therefore essential to successful antiviral therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues.
Persistent viral replication during antiviral therapy (measured by HBV DNA levels) is a major risk factor for the subsequent development of antiviral resistance.[Zeuzem 2009;Hadziyannis 2006;Liaw 2009b;Yuen 2001] Therefore, HBV DNA levels should be monitored at least every 3-6 months with a sensitive assay (lower limit of detection of newest assays is < 20 IU/mL) in patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver (Management Guidelines).[EASL HBV] The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines recommend monitoring every 3 months until HBV DNA is undetectable, and every 3-6 months after that (Management Guidelines).[Terrault 2016] The Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver recommend monitoring HBV DNA at Month 3 and 6 and then at regular intervals, depending on the genetic barrier to resistance of the nucleos(t)ide analogues used: every 3-6 months for agents with low-genetic barrier (ie, lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine) or every 6 months for agents with high-genetic barrier (ie, entecavir, tenofovir DF) (Management Guidelines).[APASL HBV]
Current European guidelines recommend treatment modification in patients with detectable HBV DNA levels after a predefined duration of treatment.[EASL HBV;Zeuzem 2009;Janssen 2009] The European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines have attempted to classify response patterns to nucleos(t)ide analogues and to advise treatment modification in suboptimal responders to prevent the development of resistance (Figure 4)[EASL HBV]:
- Complete virologic responders are those patients who accomplish undetectable levels of HBV DNA within 48 weeks of therapy. These patients have a low probability of emergence of viral resistance.
- Among those patients with a suboptimal response, primary nonresponse is considered distinct from a partial response. The former group is defined as patients who fail to achieve ≥ 1 log10 IU/mL drop in HBV DNA levels by 3 months after commencing therapy. A partial response is defined as an on-treatment decline in HBV DNA of ≥ 1 log10 IU/mL but failure to achieve undetectable HBV DNA levels at Week 24 (for lamivudine and telbivudine) or Week 48 (for adefovir, entecavir, tenofovir) DF. Different requirements have been set for lamivudine and telbivudine vs adefovir, entecavir, and tenofovir DF because of the lower barrier to resistance of lamivudine and telbivudine.[EASL HBV]
- Virologic breakthrough is defined as an increase in serum HBV DNA > 1 log10 above nadir after achieving a virologic response during continued treatment.[EASL HBV]
Figure 4. Patterns of response to nucleos(t)ide analogues.[Zoulim 2009]
According to guidelines, patients with a suboptimal response to nucleos(t)ide analogues at the predefined time points are eligible for treatment modification. Although there is an abundance of evidence for the advantages of treatment modification in patients with persistent viremia during therapy with lamivudine, telbivudine, and adefovir, such evidence is currently lacking for entecavir and tenofovir DF. It is unclear whether treatment modification will improve results for nonresponders or partial responders to entecavir or tenofovir DF. In fact, therapy can probably be prolonged safely in partial responders to entecavir because treatment-naive patients treated with entecavir showed very low risk of resistance after 3 years of treatment, even in those with detectable HBV DNA.[Zoutendijk 2011;Lampertico 2009;Yuen 2011] In one study, partial responders to entecavir with HBV DNA < 1000 IU/mL at Week 48 of treatment were very likely to achieve undetectable HBV DNA during prolonged therapy; indeed 81% of patients achieved this endpoint.[Zoutendijk 2011] Similarly, a considerable number of patients continued to achieve undetectable HBV DNA through Years 2 and 3 of therapy in the entecavir and tenofovir DF registration trials and investigator-initiated cohort studies.[Heathcote 2011;Chang 2009;Zoutendijk 2011;van Bommel 2010] Prolongation of therapy, as opposed to treatment modification, therefore may be justified, for example in patients with a high HBV DNA at baseline or slow responders who may require additional months of therapy to achieve undetectable levels of HBV DNA.[Zeuzem 2009;van Bommel 2010; Kwon 2013; Yang 2014; Gordon 2013] Accordingly, the European Association for the Study of the Liver practice guidelines suggest that patients with declining serum HBV DNA at 48 weeks of therapy may continue therapy with the same agent, either entecavir or tenofovir DF.[EASL HBV]
The AASLD guidelines recommend continuing monotherapy with entecavir or tenofovir DF, regardless of ALT, in patients with persistent low-level viremia, defined as a plateau in the decline of HBV DNA and/or failure to achieve undetectable HBV DNA level after 96 weeks of therapy.[Terrault 2016]
Adherence to Nucleos(t)ide AnaloguesNucleos(t)ide analogue therapy for chronic hepatitis B is often lifelong, and therefore, adherence to therapy is an important factor for success. One study showed that nearly 40% of virologic breakthroughs on therapy were not related to drug resistance,[Hongthanakorn 2011] and thus, suboptimal adherence can be suspected. Another study showed that within a 16-week follow-up period, adequate adherence was observed in only 70% of patients and adherence was even lower among younger patients.[van Vlerken 2015] Therefore, in patients with virologic breakthrough on therapy, it is important to check for medication compliance and confirm antiviral resistance with genotypic testing (Management Guidelines).[Terrault 2016] An accurate assessment of the cause of virologic breakthrough is important to avoid unnecessary changes in the treatment regimen.
Keywords: Hepatitis B, Hepatitis B-Monitoring, Hepatitis B-Treatment
|
|