- 现金
- 62111 元
- 精华
- 26
- 帖子
- 30441
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-5
- 最后登录
- 2022-12-28
|
Therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues
The aim of NA treatment is maintained viral suppression during treatment [66]. The optimal endpoint and the only situation where NA treatment can be safely discontinued is HBsAg loss, which is a rare event [74]. In HBeAg-positive patients, discontinuation of NA treatment 12 months after HBeAg seroconversion can be recommended [66] but relapse is not infrequently observed [75]. HBsAg levels may help to predict who may achieve HBsAg loss in the long-term and HBsAg may also be an interesting marker to predict HBV rebound after stopping NA treatment.
General trend of HBsAg decline during nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy
HBsAg decline during NA therapy is much slower and less pronounced compared to PegIFN treatment, although NA are much more potent on HBV DNA suppression [[69], [76], [77]]. NAs inhibit only the reverse transcription of the pgRNA but do not target the cccDNA directly. Thus, changes at transcriptional levels, particularly in the HBsAg secretory pathway, are not expected. On the other hand, IFN has both direct antiviral and immune mediated effects. It is likely that the immune modulation by IFN leads to a more dramatic decline in HBsAg production and secretion. Based on HBsAg kinetics, some authors estimated that the median time to HBsAg loss in NA treated patients could be far more than 30 years [[78], [79]]. The rate of HBsAg decline is higher in HBeAg-positive patients vs. HBeAg-negative patients [[79], [80], [81]]. The faster decline in HBeAg-positive patients, especially in the first year of NA therapy [[80], [82]], may be explained by the NA effect on HBV DNA containing virions. In addition, HBeAg-negative patients may have higher amounts of integrated HBV DNA, which can still lead to HBsAg production, as discussed above. Although HBsAg decline is very slow, there are individual differences [83]. Stronger HBsAg decline during NA therapy was associated with higher pre-treatment ALT [79] or IP-10 (CXCL-10) level [[83], [84]] confirming that immune responses are required for HBsAg decline and HBV clearance. So far there is no evidence that different NA or even combinations of NA have different effects on HBsAg kinetics [[81], [83]]. It may be more likely that inter-current events such as infections which may induce cytokines leading to HBsAg decline. Just recently, it has been shown that IFN gamma or tumor necrosis factor alfa can reduce cccDNA without cytolysis [85]
用核苷(t)ide类似物治疗
NA治疗的目的是维持治疗期间的病毒抑制[66]。最佳的终点和NA治疗可以安全停止的唯一情况是HBsAg丢失,这是一个罕见的事件[74]。在HBeAg阳性患者中,可以推荐HBeAg血清转换后12个月停止NA治疗[66],但不常见的是复发[75]。 HBsAg水平可能有助于预测谁可能实现长期的HBsAg损失和HBsAg也可能是一个有趣的标志物,预测HBV反弹后停止NA治疗。
在核苷类似物治疗期间HBsAg下降的一般趋势
在NA治疗期间,HBsAg下降比PegIFN治疗慢得多,不太明显,尽管NA对HBV DNA抑制作用更强[[69],[76],[77]]。 NAs仅抑制pgRNA的逆转录,但不直接靶向cccDNA。因此,不期望在转录水平,特别是在HBsAg分泌途径中的变化。另一方面,IFN具有直接的抗病毒和免疫介导的作用。可能的是,IFN的免疫调节导致HBsAg产生和分泌的更显着的下降。基于HBsAg动力学,一些作者估计,在NA治疗的患者中HBsAg缺失的中值时间可以远远超过30年[[78],[79]]。 HBeAg阳性患者与HBeAg阴性患者的HBsAg下降率较高[[79],[80],[81]。 HBeAg阳性患者,尤其是在NA治疗的第一年[[80],[82]],更快的下降可以通过NA对含有病毒颗粒的DNA的影响来解释。此外,如上所述,HBeAg阴性患者可能具有更高量的整合的HBV DNA,其仍然可以导致HBsAg产生。虽然HBsAg下降非常缓慢,但有个体差异[83]。 NA治疗期间更强的HBsAg下降与更高的治疗前ALT [79]或IP-10(CXCL-10)水平[[83],[84]]相关,证实免疫应答是HBsAg下降和HBV清除所必需的。到目前为止,没有证据表明不同的NA或甚至NA的组合对HBsAg动力学有不同的影响[[81],[83]]。可能更可能的是间流事件,例如可诱导导致HBsAg的细胞因子的感染降低。最近,已经表明干扰素γ或肿瘤坏死因子α可以减少cccDNA没有细胞溶解[85] |
|