- 现金
- 62111 元
- 精华
- 26
- 帖子
- 30441
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-5
- 最后登录
- 2022-12-28
|
Send to
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Dec 3. pii: S1072-7515(16)31662-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.11.009. [Epub ahead of print]
Antiviral Therapy Inhibits Viral Reactivation and Improves Survival after Repeat Hepatectomy for Hepatitis B Virus-Related Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Huang S1, Xia Y1, Lei Z1, Zou Q2, Li J1, Yang T1, Wang K2, Yan Z1, Wan X3, Shen F4.
Author information
- 1Department of Hepatic Surgery IV, the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
- 2Department of Hepatic Surgery II, the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
- 3Department of Clinical Database, the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
- 4Department of Hepatic Surgery IV, the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: [email protected].
AbstractBACKGROUND: To explore the impact of antiviral therapy (AVT) on short- and long-term outcomes after re-hepatectomy for patients with recurrent HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
STUDY DESIGN: The data of 583 consecutive patients who underwent re-hepatectomy for intrahepatic recurrence of HBV-related HCC after initial hepatectomy between 2006 and 2011 at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were analyzed. Tumor re-recurrence, recurrence to death survival (RTDS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The independent risk factors of prognoses were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. The postoperative viral reactivation, surgical morbidity and mortality were also observed.
RESULTS: Preoperative AVT reduced viral reactivation rate after re-hepatectomy (5.8% for AVT patients, 16.3% and 16.6% for non-AVT patients with viral level ≤ or >2000 IU/mL, respectively, p≤0.028). Viral reactivation and non-AVT were independent risk factors of tumor re-recurrence (hazard ratios: 1.446 and 1.778), RTDS (1.691 and 2.457) and OS (1.781 and 1.857). AVT improved long-term outcomes as compared with non-AVT with a viral level of ≤ or >2000IU/mL (5-year re-recurrence rate: 69% vs. 81% vs. 96%, respectively; 5-year RTDS rate: 47% vs. 27% vs. 17%, respectively, all p ≤ 0.016). Pre- plus postoperative AVT achieved a better 5-year OS rate than postoperative AVT alone (83% vs. 60%, p=0.045), while they had insignificant differences in 5-year re-recurrence and RTDS rates (61% vs. 77%, p=0.102; 50% vs. 44%, p=0.395).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative AVT decreased viral reactivation rate. AVT initiated either before or after re-hepatectomy contributed to better long-term prognoses after re-hepatectomy for recurrent HBV-related HCC.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.
KEYWORDS: antiviral therapy; hepatocellular carcinoma; prognosis; re-hepatectomy; recurrence; viral reactivation
PMID:27923614DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.11.009
|
|