15/10/02说明:此前论坛服务器频繁出错,现已更换服务器。今后论坛继续数据库备份,不备份上传附件。

肝胆相照论坛

 

 

肝胆相照论坛 论坛 学术讨论& HBV English 乙肝表面抗原缺失:不 所有我们希望这将是 ...
查看: 970|回复: 1
go

乙肝表面抗原缺失:不 所有我们希望这将是 [复制链接]

Rank: 8Rank: 8

现金
62111 元 
精华
26 
帖子
30437 
注册时间
2009-10-5 
最后登录
2022-12-28 

才高八斗

1
发表于 2016-7-22 13:57 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览 |打印
Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Loss: Not
All That We Hoped It Would Be

It is not often that a letter to the editor is the subject
of an editorial, but such is the case in this issue
of HEPATOLOGY.(1) The correspondence relates to
an article published 6 years ago that reported on the
risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a group of
patients chronically infected with hepatitis B who
cleared hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) from their
bloodstream.(2) It was a relatively unique cohort of
1,271 Alaskan Native persons who were followed prospectively
for nearly 20 years on average, and 158 of
them lost surface antigen (rate of 0.75 per year). With
an average 9-year follow-up after HBsAg clearance, 6
of these individuals subsequently developed HCC, 2
with cirrhosis and 4 without, corresponding to an
HCC rate of 37 cases per 100,000 person-years (95%
confidence interval 13.5-80.0).(2) However, recently
the authors identified an arithmetic error in this calculation
and in a published erratum indicated that the
actual rate of HCC among those who achieved HBsAg
clearance was 442 cases per 100,000 person-years (95%
confidence interval 162-958).(3) For comparison, the
corresponding rate in patients who did not clear their
surface antigen was 196 cases per 100,000 person-years
(95% confidence interval 141.1-264.5). Notably this
newly corrected rate of HCC in persons clearing
HBsAg is no longer significantly different from that in
persons who remained HBsAg-positive. Nonetheless,
the conclusion stated in the abstract remains correct,
that HCC can still occur after loss of HBsAg, even in
the absence of cirrhosis. The article goes on to advocate
for continued screening for HCC, even among
those who have lost surface antigen. In fact, in light of
the recalculated incidence rate, this conclusion might
even be made more forcefully, given that the rate of
HCC does not appear to be reduced in those who have
cleared surface antigen. The editors felt that it was
important to draw attention to this erratum for two
reasons: first, because a major finding in this article
was incorrectly (albeit inadvertently) represented and,
second, that the correction leaves the principal message
of the article unchanged and worthy of reemphasis,
namely, that HCC remains a concern post-HBsAg
clearance.
What have we learned about clearance of surface
antigen and risk of HCC in the 6 years that have
passed since this article was published? The short
answer is, disappointingly little. In the Risk Evaluation
of Viral Load Elevation and Associated Liver Disease/
Cancer-Hepatitis B Virus (REVEAL-HBV) study
from Taiwan of nearly 3,000 mostly hepatitis B e
antigen-negative persons with chronic HBV without
cirrhosis followed for an average of 28 years, HBsAg
seroclearance was seen in 1% per year and, among the
1,151 patients who were HBV DNA undetectable at
baseline, the incidence rate of HCC was 93.7 per
100,000 person-years in those who achieved HBsAg
clearance compared to 106.2 per 100,000 person-years
in those who did not (P 5 0.37). In multivariate analysis,
clearance of HBV DNA, but not HBsAg, was
associated with a reduced risk of HCC.(4) This essentially
corroborates the revised results from the Alaskan
Native cohort reported by Simonetti and coworkers.(2)
However, it must be acknowledged that both studies
likely suffer from insufficient power to detect differences
in HCC rates between groups. As Simonetti and
coworkers articulate in their reply to the letter to the
editor,(5) loss of HBsAg and development of HCC are
relatively rare events, so it is even less common to find
patients in both categories. This in turn makes it more
challenging to ascertain significant differences between
groups. In fact, others studying this made a similar
point.(4)
The achievement of low or undetectable HBV
DNA levels, either spontaneously or with treatment,
has been most consistently associated with a reduced
rate of HCC. In a large retrospective study of
entecavir-treated patients compared to propensity
score-matched untreated controls, treatment was associated
with a 63% reduction in HCC rates over a
median 5-year period (3.7% and 13.7%, P 5 0.03).(6)
Because undetectable or low HBV DNA is a prerequisite
for HBsAg clearance, the independent effects of
these two markers (HBV DNA suppression and
HBsAg loss) on HCC risk can be difficult to tease out.
Thus, the importance of HBsAg clearance in reducing
HCC risk remains to be determined by studies with
longer follow-up and merged large cohorts.
It is well recognized that the risk of HCC is much
higher in patients with cirrhosis than in patients without
cirrhosis chronically infected with HBV,(7) and in
this group of patients achievement of an undetectable,
rather than a low (<2,000 IU/mL), HBV DNA level
appears to be the most desirable treatment endpoint.(8)
The presence of advanced fibrosis appears to attenuate
the benefits of HBsAg clearance, arguing for the
appropriate application of antiviral therapy to prevent
cirrhosis development. Another concept that has
emerged is that cirrhosis is often missed in cohort
studies of chronic HBV, and this may confound the
assessment of benefits of HBsAg seroclearance. Studies
using noninvasive methods such as transient elastography(
9) and the FIB-4 index(10) demonstrate an
increased risk of HCC in patients with cirrhosis that is
not yet clinically apparent.
In any case, while the jury is still out in terms of the
benefits of HBsAg seroclearance on HCC risk, the
message regarding need for surveillance remains
unchanged. The available evidence indicates that
patients chronically infected with HBV remain at risk
for development of HCC, whether or not they lose
HBsAg. As we look forward to an era of therapeutics
that is increasingly focused on HBsAg loss as the most
clinically desirable endpoint,(11) a larger proportion of
patients will hopefully achieve HBsAg loss and the
question of how this influences the subsequent risk of
HCC and need for surveillance will be finally
answerable.
Michael H. Nathanson, M.D., Ph.D.1
Norah Terrault, M.P.H., M.D.2
1Yale University School of Medicine
New Haven, CT
2University of California
San Francisco, CA
REFERENCES
1) Tan CK. Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma after seroclearance
is not reduced. HEPATOLOGY 2016; doi: 10.1002/hep.28505.
2) Simonetti J, Bulkow L, McMahon BJ, Homan C, Snowball M,
Negus S, et al. Clearance of hepatitis B surface antigen and risk
of hepatocellular carcinoma in a cohort chronically infected with
hepatitis B virus. HEPATOLOGY 2010;51:1531-1537.
3) Gounder P, Bulkow L, McMahon B. Correction. HEPATOLOGY
2015;62:1330.
4) Liu J, Yang HI, Lee MH, Lu SN, Jen CL, Batrla-Utermann R,
et al. Spontaneous seroclearance of hepatitis B seromarkers and
subsequent risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 2014;63:1648-
1657.
5) Simonetti JB, Bulkow L, McMahon BJ, Homan C, Snowball
M, Negus S, et al. Reply. HEPATOLOGY 2016; doi: 10.1002/
hep.28501.
6) Hosaka T, Suzuki F, Kobayashi M, Seko Y, Kawamura Y,
Sezaki H, et al. Long-term entecavir treatment reduces hepatocellular
carcinoma incidence in patients with hepatitis B virus
infection. HEPATOLOGY 2013;58:98-107.
7) Yang JD, Kim WR, Coelho R, Mettler TA, Benson JT,
Sanderson SO, et al. Cirrhosis is present in most patients with
hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol
Hepatol 2011;9:64-70.
8) Sinn DH, Lee J, Goo J, Kim K, Gwak GY, Paik YH, et al.
Hepatocellular carcinoma risk in chronic hepatitis B virusinfected
compensated cirrhosis patients with low viral load.
HEPATOLOGY 2015;62:694-701.
9) Jung KS, Kim SU, Song K, Park JY, Kim do Y, Ahn SH, et al.
Validation of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma
prediction models in the era of antiviral therapy. HEPATOLOGY
2015;62:1757-1766.
10) Suh B, Park S, Shin DW, Yun JM, Yang HK, Yu SJ, et al.
High liver fibrosis index FIB-4 is highly predictive of hepatocellular
carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B carriers. HEPATOLOGY
2015;61:1261-1268.
11) Liang TJ, Block TM, McMahon BJ, Ghany MG, Urban S, Guo
JT, et al. Present and future therapies of hepatitis B: from discovery
to cure. HEPATOLOGY 2015;62:1893-1908.
Abbreviations: HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV, hepatitis
B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.
Received April 29, 2016; accepted May 3, 2016.
Copyright VC 2016 by the American Association for the Study of
Liver Diseases.
View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com.
DOI 10.1002/hep.28640
Potential conflict of interest: Dr. Terrault received grants from
Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead.
ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE AND
REPRINT REQUESTS TO:
Michael H. Nathanson, M.D., Ph.D.
Digestive Diseases Section, Yale University School of Medicine
300 Cedar Street, Room TAC S241D
New Haven, CT 06520-8019
Tel: 11-203-785-7312
E-mail: [email protected]

Rank: 8Rank: 8

现金
62111 元 
精华
26 
帖子
30437 
注册时间
2009-10-5 
最后登录
2022-12-28 

才高八斗

2
发表于 2016-7-22 13:57 |只看该作者
乙肝表面抗原缺失:不
所有我们希望这将是

它是不是经常,给编辑的信是主题
社论的,但这样是在这个问题上的情况下,
肝病的。(1)通信涉及
6年前发表文章称,在报道
一组肝细胞癌(HCC)的风险
患者慢性感染乙肝谁
从清除乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg),其
血液中。(2)这是一个比较特殊的人群
谁是前瞻性随访1271阿拉斯加原住民的人
近20年来的平均值,和158
他们失去了表面抗原(0.75每年率)。同
平均9年的随访HBsAg清除后,6
这些人后来发展HCC,2
肝硬化和4无,对应于
37例每100,000人年HCC率(95%
置信区间13.5-80.0)。(2)然而,最近
作者在此计算确定的算术错误
和在一个公布勘误表明
那些谁取得了其中的HBsAg肝癌的实际速率
间隙是每10万人年442案件(95%
置信区间162-958)。(3)为了比较,在
患者相应比率谁没有明确自己的
表面抗原是每10万人年196案件
(95%置信区间141.1-264.5)。值得注意的是这
在人肝癌的新的校正清除率
的HBsAg是在不再显著不同于
谁留HBsAg阳性者。尽管如此,
抽象地规定的结论仍然正确,
HBsAg消失后仍可发生肝癌,即使在
没有肝硬化。文章接着以倡导
为继续筛查肝癌,甚至在
那些谁失去表面抗原。实际上,在光
重新计算的发病率,这一结论可能
甚至可以更有力地提出,鉴于率
肝癌不会出现在那些谁必须减少
清除表面抗原。编者认为,这是
重要的是要提醒大家注意此错误有两个
原因:第一,因为在这篇文章中的重大发现
是不正确的(尽管在无意中)表示,并
第二,使校正离开主要消息
文章不变,值得再加重的,
即,肝癌仍令人担忧后的HBsAg
过关。
我们学到了关于表面的间隙
抗原和HCC的风险在具有6年
过去了,因为这篇文章发表?短
答案是令人失望的一点。在风险评估
病毒载量提升和相关肝病/
癌症乙肝病毒(REVEAL-HBV)研究
从近3000名大多是乙型肝炎e台湾
有没有慢性HBV抗原阴性者
肝硬化平均随访28年,乙肝表面抗原
血清清除被认为在每年1%和,中
1151谁是病人HBV DNA检测不到的
基线,肝癌的发病率为每93.7
10万人年在那些谁取得的HBsAg
间隙相比106.2每100,000人年
在这些谁没有(P 5 0.37)。多因素分析
HBV DNA,但不是乙肝表面抗原的清除,是
患有HCC的风险降低相关。(4)这实质上
从证实阿拉斯加修改后的结果
本地队列由西蒙内蒂和同事报道。(2)
然而,必须承认,这两项研究
从动力不足,检测的差异可能会受到影响
组间HCC率。由于西莫内蒂和
同事在他们的答复阐述的信
编辑,(5)的HBsAg的损失和HCC的发展是
比较罕见的事件,因此,它甚至不太常见找到
患者在两个类别。这又使得更多
具有挑战性的确定之间的差异显著
组。事实上,其他研究这一作出类似
点(4)
低或检测不到HBV的实现
DNA水平,自发地或待遇,
已经最一贯具有降低相关联
肝癌的速率。在一个大的回顾性研究
恩替卡韦治疗的患者相比,倾向
分数匹配的未经处理的控制,治疗相关
在HCC率减少63%通过
平均5年期(3.7%和13.7%,P 5 0.03)。(6)
由于检测不到或低HBV DNA是一个先决条件
对HBsAg清除,独立作用
这两个标志物(HBV DNA抑制和
对肝癌的风险HBsAg消失),可能很难梳理出。
因此,在降低HBsAg清除的重要性
肝癌的风险仍然是通过研究来确定
长期随访和合并大同伙。
它众所周知,肝癌的风险要
肝硬化患者的患者比不高
肝硬化慢性感染HBV的,(7),并在
本组患者的成就不可检测的,
而不是低(<2000国际单位/毫升),HBV DNA水平
似乎是最可取的治疗终点。(8)
晚期肝纤维化的存在似乎减弱
HBsAg清除的好处,对于争论
抗病毒治疗的适当应用,以防止
肝硬化发展。有另一个概念
出现是肝硬化往往是错过了在队列
慢性HBV的研究,而这可能会混淆的
乙肝表面抗原的转阴效益评估。学习
使用非侵入性方法,如瞬时弹性成像(
9)和FIB-4索引(10)表现出一个
增加肝癌的危险性肝硬化患者是
没有明显的临床症状。
在任何情况下,而陪审团仍列条款
对肝癌风险的HBsAg血清学清除的效益,
对于需要监视的遗骸的消息
不变。现有的证据表明
慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染的患者依然面临风险
为肝癌的发展,无论它们是否输
乙肝表面抗原。正如我们期待疗法的时代
即越来越注重HBsAg转阴为最
临床期望的终点,(11)中所占比例较大
患者将有望达到HBsAg消失和
这是如何影响着后续的风险问题
HCC和需要监控将是最后
回答的。
迈克尔·内桑森H.医学博士,Ph.D.1
诺拉Terrault,M.P.H.,M.D.2
医学1Yale大学医学院
纽黑文,CT
加州2University
旧金山,加州
参考文献:
1)谭CK。后血清清除肝癌的发生率
不会降低。肝病2016年; :10.1002 / hep.28505。
2)西蒙内蒂Ĵ,Bulkow L,麦克马洪​​BJ,霍曼C,雪球男,
尼格斯S等人。乙型肝炎表面抗原和风险的间隙
肝癌在人群慢性感染
乙肝病毒。肝病2010; 51:1531年至1537年。
3)Gounder P,Bulkow L,麦克马洪​​B.修正。肝病
2015年; 62:1330。
4)刘俊​​,杨喜,李MH,鲁SN,仁CL,Batrla-Utermann R,
等。乙肝seromarkers的自发和血清清除
肝癌的后续风险。 2014年肠; 63:1648-
1657。
5)西蒙内蒂JB,Bulkow L,麦克马洪​​BJ,霍曼C,雪球
男,尼格斯S等人。回复。肝病2016年; :10.1002 /
hep.28501。
6)保坂T,铃木楼小林男,塞科Y,河村Y,
濑崎H,等人。长期恩替卡韦治疗肝癌减少
癌发病患者的乙肝病毒
感染。肝病2013; 58:98-107。
7)杨JD,金WR,科埃略R,梅特勒TA,本森JT,
桑德森SO,等。肝硬化是存在于大多数患者
乙型肝炎和肝细胞癌。临床Gastroenterol
肝脏病2011; 9:64-70。
8)新芬DH,李Ĵ,咕Ĵ,K金,郭氏GY,白YH等。
慢性乙型肝炎肝细胞肝癌的风险virusinfected
代偿期肝硬化患者的病毒载量低。
肝病2015年; 62:694-701。
9)荣格KS,金秀,K歌,公园JY,金做Y,安贞焕SH等。
乙型肝炎病毒相关的肝细胞癌验证
在抗病毒治疗的时代预测模型。肝病
2015年; 62:1757年至1766年。
10)徐B,公园S,申DW,云JM,杨港币,郁SJ等。
高肝纤维化指标FIB-4是高度预测肝癌的
癌慢性乙肝病毒携带者。肝病
2015年; 61:1261年至1268年。
11)梁TJ,TM座,麦克马洪​​BJ,Ghany MG,城市S,郭
JT,等。乙肝的现在和未来疗法:从发现
治疗。肝病2015年; 62:1893年至1908年。
缩写:乙肝表面抗原,乙肝表面抗原;乙肝病毒,肝炎
病毒,乙型;肝癌,肝癌。
2016年收到的4月29日;接受2016年5月3日。
VC版权所有2016年美国协会的研究
肝病。
这篇文章在网上wileyonlinelibrary.com。
DOI 10.1002 / hep.28640
潜在的利益冲突:Terrault博士获得赠款
施贵宝公司和Gilead公司。
地址对应和
转载请:
迈克尔·内桑森H.医学博士,博士
消化系统疾病科,医学耶鲁大学医学院
300柏树街,房交S241D
纽黑文,CT 06520-8019
联系电话:11-203-785-7312
电子信箱:[email protected]
‹ 上一主题|下一主题
你需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

肝胆相照论坛

GMT+8, 2024-11-15 10:10 , Processed in 0.013475 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X1.5

© 2001-2010 Comsenz Inc.