15/10/02说明:此前论坛服务器频繁出错,现已更换服务器。今后论坛继续数据库备份,不备份上传附件。

肝胆相照论坛

 

 

肝胆相照论坛 论坛 学术讨论& HBV English 前瞻性研究急性加重表征全长乙型肝炎病毒基因组 ...
查看: 718|回复: 5
go

前瞻性研究急性加重表征全长乙型肝炎病毒基因组 [复制链接]

Rank: 8Rank: 8

现金
62111 元 
精华
26 
帖子
30437 
注册时间
2009-10-5 
最后登录
2022-12-28 

才高八斗

1
发表于 2016-1-4 19:59 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览 |打印
本帖最后由 StephenW 于 2016-1-4 20:00 编辑

A prospective study characterizing full-length hepatitis B virus genomes during acute exacerbation☆☆ [url=]Chun-Jen Liu[/url]
Chun-Jen Liu
, Pei-Jer Chen
, Ming-Yang Lai
, Jia-Horng Kao
, Ching-Fung Chang
, Hui-Lin Wu
, Wen-Yi Shau
, Ding-Shinn Chen


DOI:            http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/gast.2003.50003

AbstractBackground & Aims: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) evolves rapidly in patients with chronic hepatitis B, and HBV variation may trigger acute exacerbation. To study this relationship, we investigated full-length viral sequences before, during, and after exacerbation. Methods: We prospectively studied 14 patients with exacerbation of hepatitis B, either spontaneously (n = 4) or after receiving various medical interventions (n = 10), and measured their serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HBV DNA levels monthly. Full-length HBV genomes at baseline, at the peak of serum viral load, at ALT peak, and after ALT peak were obtained by polymerase chain reaction, sequenced, and compared. Replication activities of serial HBV variants were assayed by in vitro transfection. Results: Serum viral load was increased in all exacerbations. Viral peak preceded ALT peak in 13 (93%) of the 14 patients. At virologic peak, 12 patients (86%) harbored viral genome identical to the corresponding baseline genome. At and after ALT peak, 9 (64%) and 7 (50%) of the viral genomes remained identical to baseline, respectively. Mean nucleotide change per genome was 0.2 at virologic peak but increased to 4.4 and 8.1 at and after ALT peak, respectively. The replication potential of the viral variant that emerged during or after exacerbation was equivalent to that at baseline. Conclusions: Most exacerbations were preceded by an upsurge of serum HBV identical to the preexisting HBV strain. After exacerbation, about half of the patients were repopulated by a different viral variant, which was likely a result of immune selection.
GASTROENTEROLOGY 2003;124:80-90

Abbreviations:                AE (acute exacerbation), PCR (polymerase chain reaction)


已有 1 人评分现金 收起 理由
zgct + 3

总评分: 现金 + 3   查看全部评分

Rank: 8Rank: 8

现金
62111 元 
精华
26 
帖子
30437 
注册时间
2009-10-5 
最后登录
2022-12-28 

才高八斗

2
发表于 2016-1-4 20:01 |只看该作者
前瞻性研究急性加重表征全长乙型肝炎病毒基因组☆☆☆
骏仁刘
裴哲陈
,明杨来
佳泓花王
,清丰昌
惠林武
,文毅筲
,定希恩陈
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/gast.2003.50003

    抽象
    全文
    图片
    参考

抽象

背景与目的:乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)快速的发展在慢性乙型肝炎和HBV变异可能引发急性发作。研究这种关系中,我们调查全​​长病毒序列之前,期间和之后恶化。方法:我们前瞻性研究14例乙肝发作,自发地(N = 4),或接受各种医疗干预(N = 10),测定其血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)和HBV DNA水平每月后。全长HBV基因组在基线,在血清病毒载量的峰中,在ALT峰,和后ALT峰采用聚合酶链式反应得到的,测序,并进行比较。串行HBV变异株的复制活动通过体外转染进行测定。结果:血清病毒载量在所有恶化增加。病毒高峰期之前的14例患者中13例(93%)ALT高峰。在病毒学峰,12例(86%)窝藏病毒基因组相同于相应的基线基因组中。在与病毒基因组的ALT峰,9(64%)和7(50%)后仍保持相同的基线,分别。平均每个基因组核苷酸变化为0.2,在病毒学高峰,但提高到4.4和8.1,在和ALT高峰期后,分别。病毒变体的过程中或加重后出现复制电位为等同于在基准。结论:大多数病情加重之前是血清HBV等同于先前存在的乙肝病毒株的热潮。恶化后,将约一半的患者用不同的病毒变体,这是可能的免疫选择的结果被重新填充。

胃肠病学2003; 124:80-90
缩写:
AE(急性发作期),PCR(聚合酶链式反应)

Rank: 8Rank: 8

现金
62111 元 
精华
26 
帖子
30437 
注册时间
2009-10-5 
最后登录
2022-12-28 

才高八斗

3
发表于 2016-1-4 20:03 |只看该作者
Discussion

In this prospective study, we found that an increase in viral load invariably occurred in the course of hepatitis B exacerbation, which peaked before serum ALT level in 93% and coincided with serum ALT peak in 7% of the patients. By investigating the sequential full-length viral nucleotide sequences, we found that the viral genome at the HBV surge stage, whether developing before or coinciding with the onset of AE, remained almost identical to that at baseline (mean nucleotide changes, 0.2 per genome). During AE, the proportion of patients harboring an HBV strain different from that at baseline increased to 36%. After AE, about 50% of the viral genomes remained identical and 50% changed, predominantly possessing multiple point variations or subgenome deletion. In contrast, the serum dominant viral genome remained unchanged during 1-year follow-up in 2 HBeAg carriers. By in vitro transfection assay, we found that the replication potential of the emerged HBV strain was not enhanced compared with that of the corresponding viral strain at baseline.

The development of AE in chronic hepatitis B is suggested to be related to the break of balance between viral replication and host immune responses.4 Nevertheless, whether this break was due to the emergence of variants escaping host immune surveillance or due to the inadequate host control over viral replication remained unclarified.4, 19 Our study clearly showed that changes of viral nucleotide sequences accompanying an upsurge of serum viral load rarely occurred before the onset of AE in most patients. This finding suggested that such an increase in viral load was not due to new variants but due to reactivation of a preexisting HBV strain in most clinical situations. This implied that the break of tolerance between virus and host leading to the onset of exacerbation was more closely related to the change of host immune surveillance rather than the change of viral genome. Consistent with this speculation, about 50% of the viral genome remained unchanged during the entire course of AE. It implied that HBV replication and population in the liver, as a result of fluctuating host immune control over the same virus, might become the main cause of AE.

However, AE resulted in selection of viral variant in half of our patients. Although the mechanisms of HBV variant emergence remain controversial, certain speculations can be inferred from the chronological studies in chimpanzees and humans acutely infected with HBV.21, 30, 31, 36 In chimpanzees, HBV DNA upsurged and then largely disappeared from the liver and blood in the incubation phase, before the peak of T-cell infiltration and maximal liver damage. Noncytopathic mechanisms, possibly via activation of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor α and interferon gamma derived from an innate immune system, contributed to a rapid viral clearance in this phase.30 This noncytolytic viral clearance phase usually preceded the clinical hepatitis and went unnoted in both humans and chimpanzees.30, 31 Afterward, when viral load decreased substantially, adaptive HBV-specific immune responses (such as T cell) took over, cytolytic processes ensued, and clinical hepatitis became apparent.30, 31 In keeping with these observations, in our patients with AE of chronic hepatitis B, a significant reduction in virus level likewise occurred before maximal liver injury. Noncytolytic antiviral mechanisms thus likely contributed much to viral clearance before the hepatitis phase. After the decrease in viral load, lysis of infected hepatocytes by virus-specific adaptive immunity occurred. Because HBV-related hepatitis activity is HLA class I restricted and T-cell mediated,3 immune escape variant (if any) most likely appeared at or after the clinical hepatitis stage, as noted in previous studies.7, 8, 9 In this study, we consistently found that most nucleotide substitutions or subgenomic deletions occurred at or after the ALT peak. Furthermore, about half of the substituted nucleotides in the postexacerbation viral genomes were located within core or surface gene, in which resides several important immunogenic epitopes. Our findings support the speculation that HBV genomic differences frequently represent variations escaping from the adaptive cytolytic host immunity in the clinical hepatitis phase.23 To clarify whether the postexacerbation viral variants could escape cytotoxic T-cell recognition, functional assays targeting HLA class I–restricted T-cell epitopes are needed. Nevertheless, only a few HLA class I–restricted T-cell epitopes for HBV have been identified until now, and most are HLA-A2 restricted.3 The HLA profiles of the 7 patients harboring altered viral genome after exacerbation were all not HLA-A2 (data not shown). We thus did not perform such in vitro immunologic assays in current studies. Future prospective immunologic studies in suitable subjects are required to address these important questions.

Although the occurrence of hepatitis B exacerbation was closely preceded by an increase in serum viral load, how these 2 events were linked together remained unknown. The dynamics of viral resurgence were determined by multiple factors, including replication efficiency of individual viral strains, host immune responses, and the availability of replication space.37 An imbalance in the host immune response might bring about the enhanced viral replication if replication space within liver was available, which in turn triggered additional immune response and caused a flare of hepatitis. Nevertheless, we did not investigate the complex interplay between host immune responses and changes in viral load because the enrolled subjects were not immunologically homogeneous. On the other hand, serial liver biopsies for immunohistologic studies were not feasible in humans. The chronological relationships between changes in viral load, changes in HBV-specific and -nonspecific T-cell responses, and ALT activity should be clarified in suitable models such as woodchuck hepatitis. From the clinical point of view, the onset of hepatitis B exacerbation was almost preceded by an upsurge of viral load. If this surge is essential to trigger AE, then we speculate that if the viral load can be controlled, there would be few and even no flares of hepatitis. Previous studies comparing interferon monotherapy with the combination of lamivudine and interferon to treat chronic hepatitis B showed that the frequency of hepatitis flares indeed decreased if lamivudine was added.38 Chemotherapy-induced exacerbation of hepatitis B is another clinical condition worthy of attention in that the risk of developing liver failure increases.39 Serum viral load likewise resurges during the course of exacerbation. Whether prophylactic treatment with lamivudine can prevent the resurge of viral load and subsequently decrease the risk of hepatitis flares is now being studied in our hospital.

The true pathogenic HBV strains involved in the development of hepatitis B exacerbation were within the liver. We now evaluated the changes of the dominant viral genomes obtained from the sera in this study. As reported previously, some potential pathogenic strains might replicate actively within the liver but not be released into the circulation.40, 41 Therefore, the HBV genomic variations correlated to the development of hepatitis B exacerbation might be retained within the liver and not be detected in the specimens obtained from the circulation. Future comparisons between circulating HBV genomes and intrahepatic genomes could be helpful to answer this question.

Finally, from a viral evolution point of view, we need to consider the origin of the HBV strains at baseline. Some viral strains may exist and remain inactive in the host for a long time before reactivation, as is the case in chemotherapy-induced AE. The other baseline viral strains, especially those from repeated spontaneous AE, may just represent survivors from previous episodes of AE. These HBV survivors may either be new viral variants selected from host immune surveillance in previous exacerbations or may remain the same strain as before preceding AE and again trigger the current episode of exacerbation. In this study, we show that the replication potential of the viral variants that emerged after AE was not enhanced. Our findings suggest that these viral variants might result from immune selection. In the long run, we need to monitor the viral evolution from the individuals experiencing multiple episodes of AE to truly understand the impact of viral variations on AE.

Rank: 8Rank: 8

现金
62111 元 
精华
26 
帖子
30437 
注册时间
2009-10-5 
最后登录
2022-12-28 

才高八斗

4
发表于 2016-1-4 20:04 |只看该作者
讨论

在这项前瞻性研究中,我们发现,增加了病毒载量总是发生在乙肝发作,血清ALT水平之前,其高峰出现在93%和血清ALT峰值在7%的病人相吻合的课程。通过调查顺序全长​​病毒的核苷酸序列中,我们发现,在病毒基因组在HBV浪涌阶段,无论前开发或与AE的发生重合,几乎保持相同,在基线(平均值核苷酸变化,0.2%的基因组) 。在使用AE,患者窝藏是HBV的比例应变不同于基线增加至36%。自动曝光后,约50%的病毒基因组的保持相同,并且50%的改变,主要是具有多个点的变化或亚基因组删除。与此相反,血清显性病毒基因组维持期间的1年的随访中2 HBeAg的载波不变。通过体外转染测定中,我们发现,出现的HBV毒株的复制潜力并没有增强与相应的病毒株在基线的比较。

AE慢性乙型肝炎的发展建议可能与病毒复制和宿主免疫responses.4尽管如此之间平衡的打破,这种突破是否由于不够主机控制,是由于变体逃避宿主免疫监视或出现在病毒复制仍然unclarified.4,19我们的研究清楚地表明,伴随血清病毒载量的热潮病毒的核苷酸序列的变化发生AE的大多数患者以前很少发生。这一发现表明,这种增加在病毒载量不是由于新的变体,但由于预先存在的HBV株在大多数临床情况的再活化。这意味着,病毒与宿主导致发作的发作之间的容忍的突破是更密切相关的宿主免疫监视的改变,而不是病毒基因组的变化。与此相一致的猜测,约50%的病毒基因组的AE的整个过程中保持不变。它意味着HBV复制和人口在肝,因为在相同的病毒波动宿主免疫控制的结果,有可能成为AE的主要原因。

然而,AE导致选择病毒变异的一半的患者。尽管HBV变异体出现的机制仍然有争议,某些猜测可以从黑猩猩和人类急性感染HBV.21,30,31,36在黑猩猩,HBV DNA的按时间顺序的研究推断着增长,然后从肝脏和血液基本消失在孵育阶段,T细胞浸润和最大肝损伤的峰值之前。 Noncytopathic机制,可能通过活化细胞因子如肿瘤坏死因子α和来自先天性免疫系统衍生的干扰素γ,促成了快速的病毒清除在此phase.30这noncytolytic病毒清除阶段通常先于临床肝炎和在这两个去unnoted人类和chimpanzees.30,31之后,当病毒载量显着减少,自适应HBV特异性免疫应答(如T细胞)接管,溶细胞过程发生了,并且临床肝炎成为apparent.30,31根据这些观测,在我们治疗慢性乙型肝炎的AE,一个显著降低病毒水平最高的肝损伤之前,也发生了。 Noncytolytic抗病毒机制,肝炎阶段之前从而可能贡献良多,病毒清除。在病毒载量下降后,感染的肝细胞通过病毒特异性适应性免疫裂解发生。因为HBV相关肝炎活性是HLA I类限制性和T细胞介导,3免疫逃避变体(如果有的话)最有可能出现在或临床肝炎阶段后,如在先前的studies.7指出,8,9在这项研究,我们不断发现,大多数核苷酸替换或亚基因组缺失发生在或ALT高峰。此外,大约一半在postexacerbation病毒基因组的取代的核苷酸的多位于核心或面基因,在其中驻留的几个重要免疫原性表位之内。我们的发现支持了猜测的HBV基因组的差异表示频繁变化从在临床肝炎phase.23自适应溶细胞宿主免疫逃逸为了阐明postexacerbation病毒变异体是否能逃脱细胞毒性T细胞识别,功能测定法针对HLA I类限制性T需要β细胞表位。然而,只有少数的HLA I类限制性T细胞表位的HBV为已经确定直到如今,大多数是HLA-A2 restricted.3 7例窝藏改变的病毒基因组的HLA轮廓加重后均没有HLA-A2 (数据未显示)。因此,我们并没有在目前的研究进行这样的体外免疫测定。在合适的受试者未来潜在免疫研究来解决这些重要问题。

虽然乙肝恶化的发生密切之前增加血清病毒载量,如何将这些事件2是连在一起的不明。病毒死灰复燃的动力是由多种因素,包括个体病毒株的复制效率,宿主的免疫反应,和复制的可用性确定space.37在宿主的免疫反应失衡可能带来增强的病毒复制如果在肝脏复制空间是可利用的,这又引发额外的免疫反应而引起肝炎的光斑。然而,我们没有调查宿主免疫反应和变化之间的复杂的相互作用中的病毒载量,因为招收对象为没有免疫均匀。另一方面,串行肝活检为免疫组织研究是不是在人类中是可行的。变化病毒载量的变化HBV特异性和-nonspecific T细胞应答,和ALT活性之间的时间顺序关系应当澄清在合适的模型如土拨鼠肝炎。从临床观点来看,乙肝恶化的开始几乎之前病毒载量的热潮。如果这电涌是必不可少的触发自动曝光,然后我们推测,如果病毒载量是可以控制的,将有几个甚至没有耀斑肝炎。比较干扰素单一治疗拉米夫定和干扰素治疗慢性乙型肝炎的结合以往的研究表明,肝炎发作的频率的确下降,如果拉米夫定是乙肝added.38化疗引起的急性加重是另一个临床状况值得关注的风险恶化的过程中,开发肝衰竭increases.39血清病毒载量也resurges。无论是与拉米夫定预防性治疗可以防止病毒载量的复生,随后降低肝炎发作的风险,目前正在研究在我院。

涉及乙肝恶化发展的真正致病的HBV株肝脏内。我们现在评估从本研究中的血清获得的主要病毒基因组的改变。如先前报道,一些潜在的病原性菌株可能积极复制肝脏内,但不被释放到circulation.40,41。因此,相关的乙肝发作发展的HBV基因组的变化可能会在肝脏内被保留,而不应在检测从循环获得的样本。循环HBV基因组和肝内基因组之间的未来比较可能有助于回答这个问题。

最后,从一个病毒的演变来看,我们需要考虑的乙肝病毒毒株的起源基线。一些病毒株可能存在并保持不活动在宿主很长一段时间再激活前,如在化疗诱导的AE的情况。其他基线病毒毒株,尤其是那些反复自发自动曝光,可能只是表示从AE的早期发作的幸存者。这些HBV生还可以是从在以前的加重宿主免疫监视选定的新的病毒变体,或者可以保持相同菌株作为前述曝光之前和再次触发恶化的当前集。在这项研究中,我们表明,未增强的自动曝光以后出现的病毒变异体的复制潜力。我们的研究结果表明,这些病毒变种可能会导致免疫选择。从长远来看,我们需要监控从个人经历AE多次发作真正理解对AE病毒变异的影响病毒进化。
已有 1 人评分现金 收起 理由
zgct + 3

总评分: 现金 + 3   查看全部评分

Rank: 8Rank: 8

现金
62111 元 
精华
26 
帖子
30437 
注册时间
2009-10-5 
最后登录
2022-12-28 

才高八斗

5
发表于 2016-1-4 20:05 |只看该作者

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

现金
3543 元 
精华
帖子
2934 
注册时间
2001-10-26 
最后登录
2018-12-25 
6
发表于 2016-1-4 20:36 |只看该作者
好文,感谢!
建议有实力的众筹基金会,十亿元级以上,真劝慰雷军、地产商、首富、百度,强生战略入股,全球重金悬赏求拜攻克乙肝的美国古巴专家英才及技术!!齐参与、正能量,或许好药就在转角间被发现,如果没有?就用真实去验证及考证中草药民间名医,延长寿命
嘤其鸣矣,求其友声! 相彼鸟矣,犹求友声;矧伊人矣,不求友生?神之听之,
‹ 上一主题|下一主题
你需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

肝胆相照论坛

GMT+8, 2024-11-3 04:10 , Processed in 0.014337 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X1.5

© 2001-2010 Comsenz Inc.