![Rank: 8](static/image/common/star_level3.gif) ![Rank: 8](static/image/common/star_level3.gif)
- 现金
- 62111 元
- 精华
- 26
- 帖子
- 30437
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-5
- 最后登录
- 2022-12-28
|
TITLE: Investigation of HBV rtA181T mutation in a large number of Chinese patients with chronic HBV infection
AUTHORS (FIRST NAME, LAST NAME): Xiaodong Li1, Yan Liu1, Liming Liu1, Pan Zhao1, Jiuzeng Dai1, Zengtao Yao1, Shaojie Xin1, Dongping Xu1
Institutional Author(s):
INSTITUTIONS (ALL): 1. Institute of Infectious Diseases and Liver Failure Research Center, Beijing 302 Hospital, Beijing, China.
ABSTRACT BODY: Aim: The study aimed to investigate HBV rtA181T mutation profile in clinical practice and its clinical implications.
Methods: Serum samples from 18,419 patients collected from July 2007 to June 2012 in Beijing 302 Hospital were investigated. Around 92% patients experienced nucleos(t)ide analogs. The rtA181T mutation and HBV genotype were determined by direct sequence analysis. Viral replication capacity, drug susceptibility and HBsAg secretion were determined in HepG2 cells that had been transfected with replication-competent HBV vectors containing reverse-transcriptase/S genes.
Results: rtA181T was detected from 750 patients. The incidence escalated in the past five years (1.97%, 2.47%, 3.84%, 5.21%, and 6.35%); rtA181T emerged either alone or with other drug-resistant mutations (37.3% alone, 48.6% with adefovir-resistant mutation rtA181V/N236T, 12.1% with lamivudine-resistant mutation rtM204V/rtM204I, and 2.0% with entecavir- or multidrug-resistant mutations, respectively). In patients harboring rtA181T, 96.7% experienced adefovir and/or lamivudine, including 19.5% experienced single adefovir, 12.0% experienced single lamivudine, 49.4% experienced both adefovir and lamivudine, and 15.8% experienced adefovir/lamivudine plus telbivudine/entecavir). Only four patients with rtA181T were antivirals-naive. HBV genotype C/B were 93.0%/7.0% for rtA181T positive patients, and 84.6%/15.4% for rtA181T negative patients (P <0.01), suggesting there was a positive link between rtA181T with genotype C HBV. Most but not all rtA181T led to sW172* (stop codon) mutation on overlapping S-gene and coexistence of rtA181T/sW172* with wild-type sequence was frequently detected (22.0% presented as sW172* alone, 69.9% presented as sW172* concomitant with the wild-type, 5.7% presented as sW172* with sW172/L or sW172S, etc). Phenotypic analysis of representative rtA181T/sW172* strains showed that the 50% effective concentration (EC50) values of adefovir for the mutants were 1.8-fold to 2.9-fold higher than that of wild-type strain. By contrast, the EC50 of adefovir for rtA181V or rtN236T mutants was at least 3.5-fold higher than that of wild-type strain. A defect in HBsAg secretion and a decreased replication capacity of rtA181T (sW172*) strain were observed in comparison with wild-type strain in vitro; while no significant difference in average serum HBsAg and HBV DNA levels was observed between patients with and without rtA181T/sW172*.
Conclusions: The emergence of HBV rtA181T mutation is closely associated with adefovir and lamivudine exposure, but it may not directly cause adefovir resistance. The clinical significance of rtA181T should be properly interpreted.
|
|