- 现金
- 62111 元
- 精华
- 26
- 帖子
- 30441
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-5
- 最后登录
- 2022-12-28
|
Abstract 765
TWELVE-MONTHS ENTECAVIR LONGITUDINAL CHANGES IN LIVER FIBROSIS, ACTIVITY AS PER FIBROTEST-FIBROMAX AND LIVER STIFFNESS MEASUREMENTS IN CHRONIC HEPATITIS B. STEATOSIS IMPACT ON FIBROSIS REGRESSION
F. Zoulim1, X. Causse2, V. Leroy3, D. Ouzan4, N. Ganne5, V. Bourcier5, V. de Ledinghen6, P. Mathurin7, J. Moussalli8, M. Rudler8, L. Bonyhay8, D. Thabut8, R. Pais8, J. Massard8, V. Di Martino9, F. Dranne10, C. Renou11, J.-P. Bronowicki12, Y. Ngo10, M. Munteanu10*, T. Poynard8, ENTEFIB Group
1Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, 2CHR Orleans La Source, Orléans, 3CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, 4Institut Arnaud Tzanck, France, 5Hôpital Jean Verdier, Bondy, 6Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux, 7CHU Lille, Lille, 8UPMC APHP Liver Center, GH Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, 9CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon, 10BioPredictive, Paris, 11Hepatology, CH- Hyeres Hospital, Hyeres, 12CHU Nancy, Nancy, France. *[email protected]
Background: Fibrosis-regression rate in treated chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients was similar using Fibrotest (Biopredictive) or liver biopsy, while for liver stiffness measurements (LSM) by Fibroscan(Echosens) there was a possible overestimation related to necroinflammatory activity (NIA)(AVT 2010).
Aim: To prospectively evaluate the histological impact of a strong inhibitor of HBV-replication, entecavir motherapy at 0.5mg per day, using non-invasive methods, i.e. FibroMax (including Fibrotest, Actitest, Steatotest for estimating fibrosis, activity and steatosis) and LSM.
Methods: 133-CHB monoinfected, NUC-naive patients were pre-included in 19 centers in France. Data was recorded at baseline(M0), six, and 12-months(M6,M12): viral load, Fibromax [panel of scores (0-1)] and LSM(0-75kPa). Applicability(App) was defined as after exclusion of unreliable LSM and failures. Viral response (VR) was defined as undetectable HBVDNA. Statistics included repeated measures AVOVA (Bonferroni Multiple-Comparison Tests).
Results: 116patients were included [5 lost of follow-up, 9 missing, 3 non-App Fibrotest (acute flare-up ALT>600IU/L)]. Characteristics were: age 44(19-82)yrs; 72%males; 70% anti-HBe(+); 46% Caucasian; 2.6% alcohol>20g/day; median viral load=4.6 logIU/ml; App-LSM 81%(55/68). 31%(N=36) had advanced fibrosis (AF, F2F3F4-METAVIR) and 11%(N=12) cirrhosis as per Fibrotest; 46%(N=53) significant NIA (A1A2A3-METAVIR) as per Actitest; 26%(N=21) had M0 steatosis>1% as per Steatotest. 88 patients achieved M6, 61 M12 with 64% M6-VR and 84% M12-VR. Significant NIA as per ActiTest regressed from M0 0.58(0.03) to M6 0.27(0.03,P< 0.0001) and M12 0.27(0.03,P< 0.0001 vsM0). The same was true for AF as per FibroTest: M0 0.67(0.02) vs M6 0.56(0.02,P=0.0001) and M12 0.54(0.02,P=0.002 vsM0). Among AF-patients without M6 fibrosis-regression, 43% had baseline steatosis>5% as per Steatotest compared to 0% (p=0.04) in AF-patients that regressed fibrosis. As per AF App-LSM no regression was observed vs M0 at M6[8.5(1)vs10.1(1)kPa, P=0.28] but at M12 [6.3(0.4)kPa,P=0.009 vs M0)]. M6 regressions of significant NIA and AF as per Actitest and Fibrotest were observed regardless the VR (vs non-VR) 32% vs 48%(p=0.30) and 38% vs 50% (p=0.74), respectively.
Conclusion: After six and twelve months of entecavir treatment, advanced fibrosis and activity as presumed by Fibrotest-Actitest were significantly reduced, regardless of the viral response. Fibrosis-regression as per liver stiffness measurement was observed only after twelve-month treatment. Patients without fibrosis-regression after 6-months treatment had more baseline steatosis.
Assigned speakers:
Dr. Mona Munteanu, BioPredictive , Paris , France
Assigned in sessions:
26.04.2013, 09:00-18:00, Poster Session, P02-07c, Category 07c: Viral Hepatitis B & D: Clinical (therapy, new compounds, resistance), Poster Area
|
|