- 现金
- 356 元
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 158
- 注册时间
- 2012-8-18
- 最后登录
- 2012-10-18
|
Prevention and management of drug resistant hepatitis B virus infections
Cheng Wang,
Rong Fan,
Jian Sun,
Jinlin Hou*
Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology Unit, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
*Professor Jinlin Hou, Hepatology Unit and Key Lab for Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou 510515, China. Email address: [email protected]
Article first published online: 21 AUG 2012
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07198.x
Abstract
In the past decade, broadened therapeutic options of oral direct antiviral agents for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection include: Lamivudine, Adefovir Dipivoxil, Telbivudine, Entecavir and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate. These direct oral antiviral agents effectively suppress the replication of the virus and reduce the risk of potential liver-related complications. However, prolonged use of these nucleos(t)ide analogues has been associated with drug resistance that compromises the initial clinical benefits. Moreover, the oncogenic risk of mutations due to prolonged nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy needs to be further investigated by in vitro and in vivo studies. In the current era of potent nucleotide analogues, new data are emerging, we are still facing the pool of patients who have developed resistance to the prior generation of nucleos(t)ide analogues. This paper aims to focus on incidence of antiviral drug resistance and virological breakthrough, prudent selection of initial therapy, on-treatment monitoring for drug resistance and revise treatment strategies for patients with resistant virus.
Background
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infects 400 million people worldwide; more than 75% of those reside in the Asia-Pacific area.1 Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection is the major risk factor for cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).2,3 Increasing serum HBV DNA level is a strong predictor associated with progression to cirrhosis and HCC.4,5 Substantial advances have been made during the last decade with the worldwide clinical use of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA). Since 1998, five NA have been licensed: Lamivudine (LAM), Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), Telbivudine (LdT), Entecavir (ETV) and Tenofovir Disoproxil fumarate (TDF). These direct oral antiviral agents effectively suppress the replication of HBV and reduce the risk of potential liver-related complications. Sustained and profound suppression of viral replication together with reversal of fibrosis and cirrhosis are achievable.6 Based on specific viral kinetics and low sustaining off-treatment response, long-term NAs treatment is necessary.7,8 However, the major concern of prolonged NA treatment of CHB can result in development of antiviral resistance with reduced sensitivity to the antiviral agents, thus compromising the initial clinical benefits.
Perspectives
While major advances in the treatment of CHB has been made in the past decade, the prevention and management of drug resistance is still very challenging. The role of periodical monitoring of quantitative HBsAg level and HBV genotypes remains controversial. Oncogenic potential of drug resistance needs further investigation. To ultimately overcome the cross-resistance and multiple resistances, the development of drugs with distinct antiviral mechanism of NA is essential. Chinese scientists recently indicated that combination of NA with Oxymatrine, a natural drug extracted from a Chinese herb (Kushen), could reduce the chance of developing drug resistance.105 Such agents provide complementary treatment options. In this era of potent NA treatment, options have been expanded; various combination regimens including interferon-based therapies are available. However, the efficacy of the best combination, best timing of initiation, duration of therapy, potential add-on side effects due to drug interaction are uncertain. Although theoretically attractive, these combinations and applications from bench to bedsides still await justification from larger scale clinical studies and cost–benefit analyses.
|
|