15/10/02说明:此前论坛服务器频繁出错,现已更换服务器。今后论坛继续数据库备份,不备份上传附件。

肝胆相照论坛

 

 

肝胆相照论坛 论坛 学术讨论& HBV English [APASL2012]慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)肝炎突发的病毒学和免疫 ...
查看: 591|回复: 2
go

[APASL2012]慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)肝炎突发的病毒学和免疫学机制 [复制链接]

Rank: 8Rank: 8

现金
62111 元 
精华
26 
帖子
30437 
注册时间
2009-10-5 
最后登录
2022-12-28 

才高八斗

1
发表于 2012-2-29 18:24 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览 |打印
[APASL2012]慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)肝炎突发的病毒学和免疫学机制——Prof.Antonio Bertoletti专访            

-----


            

来源: 作者:Antonio.Bertoletti 发布时间:2012-2-21 14:34:02   阅读:224


                           Again we say there are activated T cells that are recruited in the liver. They are also able to release other cytokines, and it does now seem more important that the same macrophages and granulocytes that are recruited by the same chemokines, that are recruiting these activated cells, are important for liver damage.
                                               
                                                                                                            

  IHEP: In your presentation you were talking about the effect of liver damage on immune response and how T cells affect liver damage. A lot of us assume that T cell response is connected to a more damaged liver, but you said something a little different than this.
  Dr Bertoletti: Yes there is definitely this general idea that the quantity of the T cells is absolutely proportionally correlated with liver damage. In reality things are much more complex. We have data both in animal models and in patients that are showing that the T cells are important, but they are probably important as they show the start of inflammatory events in the liver. Therefore, what does this mean? Probably if we you have a good T cell response, you have some liver damage, but this is then going to completely clear the virus, and you don’t have a persistent chronicity.  And that’s what is happening in acute hepatitis B - damage, control of the virus, and no chronicity anymore. In patients with chronic hepatitis the data shows that you have some T cells that are not functionally able to fully control the virus, and therefore they start to recruit other cells - other inflammatory cells, macrophages, granulocytes - that are actually the real cause of the liver damage. Therefore we say the inflammatory events that can be triggered by inefficient T cell response are the greater cause of liver damage.
  IHEP: The inefficient T cell response triggers inflammatory events by recruiting the other non-HBV specific T cells. Why does that cause inflammation?
  Dr Bertoletti: Again we say there are activated T cells that are recruited in the liver. They are also able to release other cytokines, and it does now seem more important that the same macrophages and granulocytes that are recruited by the same chemokines, that are recruiting these activated cells, are important for liver damage. Granulocytes can actually release many enzymes that can directly. And they perpetrate this chonicity of inflammatory events that is present in chronic hepatitis B.
  IHEP: What can you tell us about the slides shown today where chimpanzees were given very low viral loads?
  Dr Bertoletti: Yes this was very interesting work that was done in the Scripps Clinic. And again that’s something that is going a little bit against the classical dogma. Generally speaking, we were thinking that large quantities of virus might actually cause chronicity. In reality what this research has shown is that it’s not only that the quantity of the virus is important for chronicity or control, but he showed that a very low quantity of virus, and probably with the virus there is a replication lowering that is not detected by the new system. And therefore, we say it’s then reaching a threshold of quantity that cannot be controlled anymore. And in that data, he really showed that apparently only one in ten viruses injected in a chimpanzee were able to cause chonicity. I would say this is interesting, and there is also other data in other animal models, where they are showing that: when there are very few viruses that are replication lowering, these viruses are not detected by the immune system. They are sort of sneaking out from the recognition of immunity. And therefore they are causing chronicity. It is not always that the large dose is causing chronicity. And yes there are many aspects that we still don’t understand, and they are very interesting and are against our normal dogma.
  IHEP: So perhaps it’s not just the absolute number of the virus that alerts the immune system, but the amount that the virus is replicating.
  Dr Bertoletti: Yes, correct. It is the speed of the replication. It is the speed of the replication at that point is triggering
  IHEP: You talked a lot about liver damage and how it affects our immune response. So if we have liver damage, do you have an immune deficiency?
  Dr Bertoletti: I show this data because I think it is interesting to see how release of enzymes from the damaged hepatocytes can not only suppress the immune system, and particularly arginase.  Arginase seems to inhibit the T cell response, not only specific for the virus, but the general immune response. Again this is very old data, like 20 years ago they were already showing that there was something in the serum of the patients that can suppress these T cells. Then your question is:  If we can see that arginase, the enzymes that are released by the hepatocytes can actually suppress all of the immune system. Does it mean that we may have other viral infections?  I think, again, this is something that apparently is not (done/looked at) so frequently in clinics, even though there is some data suggesting that there may be some reactivation, for example, simplex virus infection in some patients with acute hepatitis. But the point is that probably this suppression is somehow a suppression that is only reducing the general high quantity of gamma-interferon of inflammatory cytokines. These cells are not completely paralyzed. They are still able to control other viruses. Therefore you don’t have a very severe immune deficiency. This mechanism is probably just a mechanism that the organ is using to block excessive liver damage.
  IHEP: Does this liver damage restrict one’s ability to respond to the hepatitis B virus?
  Dr Bertoletti: Probably yes it is restricted but it’s probably here also a question of kinetics. You have damage when you already have good T cells that are already somehow clearing a large part of the virus. And therefore I honestly don’t think this could happen, and it could actually be a factor that is important for the chonicity. I see it more as a fact of, let’s say, avoiding At the end of the day we can see that the FMHEP hepatitis can help hepatitis B, but it is rare, it’s about 1 or 2%. Even though we know that all the hepatocytes are always infected, and we have a good T cell response. So somehow you would think you would have more cases of FMHEP because all the hepatocytes are infected and you have good T cells. This is not happening. Probably it’s not happening because you have this sort of mechanism that are somehow saying to the immune response “ok that’s it, you have already started to clear the virus, but now stop, take a little bit more time because otherwise you are going to destroy the liver.”
  IHEP: The last doctor talked about how we should be using immunological control to start treating hepatitis B and he said that you were doing some work on this.
  Dr Bertoletti: Yes we have tried to develop a potential way to restore immune response. At the moment what we have done is be able to select antigen specific T cells from the acute patients; we clone the T cell receptor; the T cell receptor is the element that is giving the specificity to the T cells. And we able to take this T cell receptor and put it in the same T cells of chronic patients or of normal individuals. So in a way we are able to reconstitute an antigen specific T cell response. We have done some work in vivo and in the animal models, and we are showing that the gene therapy, because in reality it is a gene therapy. We are taking the gene of a T cell receptor and putting it in the T cells, and this is able to restore an antigen specific disorder. This is working in mice and it’s working in vitro. We have not yet done work in humans; however, we now have started to treat patients, not with chronic hepatitis, but with hepatocellular carcinoma that is expressing HBV antigens, and we introduce T cells that are able to recognize HBV antigens in these patients, particularly in patients with metastasis because we have already selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis that are able to express HBV antigens and we will try to use this adoptive transfer of T cells specific for this antigen to clear this metastasis. I think at the moment this therapy is a little bit too experimental to be tried in patients.
  IHEP: So you would only use it in the more dire case?
  Dr Bertoletti: At the moment, yes because we are still afraid that adoptively transferring large quantities antigen specific cells in chronic patients might actually cause some liver damage.
  IHEP: What do you think will be the next step that we need to take before we can start using it in chronic HBV?
  Dr Bertoletti: I think first we need to try this treatment in patients’ hepatocellular carcinoma and really see whether we are able to control the liver damage that could occur. I am actually confident that this is not going to happen. For example, I would like to remind you again about some of the data that was presented Fu xing wen. He showed that bone marrow transplantation is actually able to control some viral infections in chronic patients. The bone marrow transplantation is a similar thing. You take bone marrow with antigen specific T cells and put it in a patient that has a chronic infection. There were cases where yes they have acute hepatitis, so there was liver damage, but then the patient was able to control. I think we really need to understand better the ratio between antigen specific T cells and liver damages and see when it could be safe to introduce a certain number of T cells in patients with a certain level of viral infection.

Rank: 8Rank: 8

现金
62111 元 
精华
26 
帖子
30437 
注册时间
2009-10-5 
最后登录
2022-12-28 

才高八斗

2
发表于 2012-2-29 18:25 |只看该作者
[APASL2012]慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)的肝炎突发的病毒学和免疫作者:机制 - 的安东尼贝托列提教授专访

-----

来源:作者:Antonio.Bertoletti发布时间:2012-2-21 14时34分02秒阅读:224

再次,我们说,有被激活的T细胞在肝脏中招募。他们还能够释放其他细胞因子,它现在似乎更重要的相同招募相同的趋化因子,招募这些活化细胞,粒巨噬细胞和肝功能损害的重要。

中国科学院高能物理研究所:在您的演示文稿,你都在谈论肝损伤的免疫反应和T细胞如何影响肝功能损害。我们很多人都认为T细胞的反应被连接到一个更受损的肝脏,但你说的比这一点不同的东西。
医生贝托列提:是的,有肯定是这一总体思路,T细胞的数量绝对比例与肝损伤相关。在现实中的事情要复杂得多。我们必须在动物模型和数据显示,T细胞是重要的患者,但他们很可能是重要的,因为他们在肝脏炎症活动开始。因此,这是什么意思?如果我们你有一个良好的T细胞的反应,你可能有一些肝功能损害,但然后要彻底清除病毒,和你没有持久的慢性。这是发生在急性B型肝炎 - 损害,控制病毒,无慢性化了。在慢性肝炎患者的数据表明,你有不属于功能能够完全控制病毒,因此,他们开始聘请其他细胞 -  T细胞等炎性细胞,巨噬细胞,粒细胞 - 这是实际上的真正原因肝功能损害。因此,我们说的,可以由低效的T细胞反应引起的炎症事件是肝脏损害更大的事业。
高能物理:低效的T细胞反应触发招募其他非HBV特异性T细胞的炎症事件。为什么会引起炎症?
医生贝托列提:同样,我们说有激活T细胞在肝脏中招募。他们还能够释放其他细胞因子,它现在似乎更重要的相同招募相同的趋化因子,招募这些活化细胞,粒巨噬细胞和肝功能损害的重要。粒细胞实际上可以释放多种酶,可直接。他们犯下这是目前慢性乙型肝炎炎症活动chonicity
中国科学院高能物理:你能告诉我们今天显示的幻灯片,黑猩猩被病毒载量非常低?
贝托列提博士:是的,这是非常有趣的斯克里普斯诊所做的工作。并再次,是对经典的教条去一点点的东西。一般来说,我们所想的,大量的病毒实际上有可能引起慢性。在现实中,这项研究表明的是,它是不仅这是重要的慢性或控制病毒的数量,但他发现1病毒非常低的数量,可能与病毒有是1复制的降低,是不是检测新系统。因此,我们说,它达到了无法控制的数量门槛。和数据,他真的表明,显然只能注入黑猩猩的十大病毒之一能够引起chonicity,。我会说这是有趣的,也有其他数据在其他动物模型,在那里他们表明:当很少有病毒复制降低,这些病毒都没有检测到的免疫系统。他们是偷偷从免疫识别的排序。因此,他们是造成慢性。它并不总是大剂量造成慢性。是有很多方面,我们仍然不明白,他们是非常有趣,对我们正常的教条。
中国科学院高能物理研究所:也许这不只是绝对数量的病毒,免疫系统发出警报,但病毒复制的金额。
医生贝托列提:是的,纠正。这是复制的速度。这是复制的速度,在这一点上触发
中国科学院高能物理研究所:你谈了很多关于肝功能损害,以及它如何影响我们的免疫反应。因此,如果我们有肝功能损害,你有免疫缺陷吗?
贝托列提博士:我表明这个数据,因为我觉得有趣的是看到如何从受损的肝细胞酶的释放,不仅可以抑制免疫系统,特别是精氨酸。精氨酸似乎抑制T细胞的反应,不仅具体的病毒,但一般的免疫反应。再次,这是很老的数据,就像20年前,他们已经显示有T细胞,可以抑制这些患者的血清中的东西。然后你的问题是:如果我们可以看到,精氨酸,是由肝细胞释放的酶可以抑制免疫系统的所有。这是否意味着,我们可能有其他病毒感染?再次,我认为,这是东西,显然是不(做/看着)在诊所如此频繁,即使有一些数据表明,有可能是一些激活,例如,在一些急性肝炎患者,单纯的病毒感染。但问题是,这种抑制可能是某种抑制,仅减少炎性细胞因子γ-干扰素的数量一般。这些细胞是不完全瘫痪。他们仍然能够控制其他病毒。因此,你不要有一个非常严重的免疫缺陷。这种机制可能是只是一个机制,机关使用,以阻止过多的肝功能损害。
中国科学院高能物理研究所:这个肝损伤限制B型肝炎病毒的反应能力?
贝托列提博士:可能是它被限制,但它可能在这里也动力学问题。你有损害时,你已经有很好的T细胞是已经以某种方式清除病毒的很大一部分。 ,因此,老实说,我不认为这可能发生,它实际上可能是一个因素,是为chonicity重要。我看到作为一个事实,让说,在年底的一天,我们可以看到,FMHEP肝炎可以帮助乙肝避免,但它是罕见的,它是约1%或2%。尽管我们知道,总是感染的肝细胞,我们有一个很好的T细胞反应。不知何故,你会觉得,因为所有的肝细胞被感染,你有很好的T细胞,你将有更多的案件FMHEP。这是不会发生的。可能它是不会发生的事情,因为你有这种机制,正在某种程度上说,免疫反应“OK就是这样,你已经开始清除病毒,但现在停止,采取一点点更多的时间,因为否则你是要摧毁肝脏。“
中国科学院高能物理研究所:最后医生谈到,我们应该如何使用免疫控制开始治疗乙肝,他说,你做了一些这方面的工作。
贝托列提博士:是的,我们曾尝试开发一个潜在的方法来恢复免疫反应。目前,我们所做的是能够选择抗原特异性T细胞急性白血病患者,我们克隆的T细胞受体的T细胞受体特异性T细胞的元素。而我们能够采取这种T细胞受体,并把它的慢性病患者或正常人相同的T细胞。因此,在某种程度上,我们是能够重组抗原特异性T细胞反应。我们已经做了一些工作,并在动物模型体内,我们显示,基因治疗,因为在现实中,它是一种基因疗法。我们正在采取的T细胞受体的基因,并把它在T细胞,这是能够恢复抗原特异性疾病。这是工作在小鼠和它在体外的工作。我们还没有在人类的工作;但是,我们现在已经开始治疗的病人,不与慢性肝炎,但表达HBV抗原与肝癌,我们引进,都能够认识到在这些患者中乙肝病毒抗原的T细胞,特别是在有转移的患者,因为我们已经选择了与肝癌转移的患者,能够表达HBV抗原,我们将尝试使用这种抗原特异性T细胞过继转移到清除此转移。我认为在目前这种疗法是有点太实验,试图在患者。
中国科学院高能物理研究所:所以你只会更可怕的情况下使用?
医生贝托列提:此刻,是因为我们依然担心,继慢性乙型肝炎患者在传输大量抗原特异性细胞实际上可能导致一些肝功能损害。
中国科学院高能物理:你认为将是下一步,我们需要之前,我们就可以开始使用它在慢性乙肝吗?
贝托列提博士:我认为,首先,我们需要尝试这个病人的肝癌的治疗,真正看到我们是否能够控制肝脏的损害可能发生的。其实我有信心,这是不会发生的。例如,我想再次提醒你一些数据,提出了富兴文。他表明,骨髓移植,实际上是能够控制一些慢性乙型肝炎患者病毒感染。骨髓移植是一个类似的事情。你带抗原特异性T细胞的骨髓,并把它在有慢性感染的病人。还有的地方是,他们有急性肝炎的病例,所以有肝功能损害,但随后病人是可以控制的。我认为,我们确实需要更好地了解抗原特异性T细胞和肝脏损害之间的比例看时,它可能是安全的,引进具有一定水平的病毒感染患者的T细胞在若干。
已有 1 人评分现金 收起 理由
MP4 + 3

总评分: 现金 + 3   查看全部评分

Rank: 6Rank: 6

现金
1904 元 
精华
帖子
1665 
注册时间
2011-11-30 
最后登录
2024-5-14 
3
发表于 2012-2-29 22:53 |只看该作者
嗯嗯…嗯
‹ 上一主题|下一主题
你需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

肝胆相照论坛

GMT+8, 2024-11-1 10:37 , Processed in 0.013508 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X1.5

© 2001-2010 Comsenz Inc.