15/10/02说明:此前论坛服务器频繁出错,现已更换服务器。今后论坛继续数据库备份,不备份上传附件。

肝胆相照论坛

 

 

肝胆相照论坛 论坛 学术讨论& HBV English [news comments]Disease Tolerance as a Defense Strate ...
查看: 538|回复: 1
go

[news comments]Disease Tolerance as a Defense Strategy [复制链接]

Rank: 8Rank: 8

现金
62111 元 
精华
26 
帖子
30441 
注册时间
2009-10-5 
最后登录
2022-12-28 

才高八斗

1
发表于 2012-2-28 23:34 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览 |打印
New strategies for treatment of infectious diseases
       
                From the PharmaLive.com News Archive - Feb. 23, 2012                                                                                                       

IGC scientist and others propose new look on killer diseases, in Science

The immune system protects from infections by detecting and eliminating invading pathogens. These two strategies form the basis of conventional clinical approaches in the fight against infectious diseases. In the latest issue of the journal Science(*), Miguel Soares from the IGC together with Ruslan Medzhitov from Yale University School of Medicine and David Schneider from Stanford University propose that a third strategy needs to be considered: tolerance to infection, whereby the infected host protects itself from infection by reducing tissue damage and other negative effects caused by the pathogen or the immune response against the invader. The authors argue that identifying the mechanisms underlying this largely overlooked phenomenon may pave the way to new strategies to treat many human infectious diseases.

Upon invasion by pathogens (bacteria, viruses or parasites), the immune system kicks into action, by detecting, destroying and ultimately eliminating the pathogen. This so-called “resistance to infection” is crucial in protecting the host from infection, but is often accompanied by collateral damage to some of the host’s vital tissues (liver, kidney, heart, brain). If uncontrolled tissue damage may have lethal consequences, as often happens, for example, in severe malaria, severe sepsis and possibly other infectious diseases. Tolerance reduces the harmful impact of infection and of the ensuing immune response on the host.

Although a well-studied phenomenon in plant immunity, tolerance to infection has been largely overlooked in mammals, including humans. While there is still much to be learnt about how and under which circumstances tolerance to infection is employed by the host, most of what is currently known about the molecular mechanisms underlying this host defense strategy comes from work carried out at the Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência by the group led by Miguel Soares. The team is particularly interested in identifying disease-specific tolerance mechanisms, on the one hand, and also general strategies of tolerance, that may, possibly, be employed protectively, to precondition the host to future infections.

Because resistance is, generally, the only mechanism considered in animal and human studies, when the host capitulates to infection it is often attributed to failure of the immune system. The authors argue that this is not always the case, and underscore the importance of distinguishing between failed resistance and failed tolerance as the cause for morbidity and mortality by infectious diseases. This distinction will dictate the choice of therapeutic approaches. When the primary problem is failed tolerance, then boosting the immune system, or administering antibiotics, may be ineffective. In this case, enhancing tolerance would possibly be much more effective in fighting infectious, inflammatory and auto-immune diseases.

(*) Ruslan Medzhitov, David Schneider, Miguel Soares (2012) Disease Tolerance as a Defense Strategy. Science 335(6071): 936-941


已有 1 人评分现金 收起 理由
interdetect + 20

总评分: 现金 + 20   查看全部评分

Rank: 8Rank: 8

现金
62111 元 
精华
26 
帖子
30441 
注册时间
2009-10-5 
最后登录
2022-12-28 

才高八斗

2
发表于 2012-2-28 23:37 |只看该作者
治疗传染病的新战略

从PharmaLive.com新闻档案 -  2012年2月23日,

IGC的科学家和其他人提出对致命疾病的新面貌,在科学

免疫系统的保护,通过检测和消除入侵的病原体感染。这两种策略的临床常规方法在防治传染病的斗争中形成的基础。建议在最新的“科学”杂志(*),米格尔·苏亚雷斯从斯坦福大学从耶鲁大学医学院和大卫·施耐德的与鲁斯兰Medzhitov IGC的问题,需要考虑的第三个战略:抗感染,即感染主机免受感染,减少组织损伤和其他的病原体或反对侵略者的免疫反应所造成的负面影响。作者认为,查明这在很大程度上被忽视的现象背后的机制可能铺平了道路,新的战略来治疗许多人类的传染病。

病原体(细菌,病毒或寄生虫)入侵后,免疫系统踢成行动,通过检测,破坏和最终消除病原体。这种所谓的“抗感染”是在保护主机免受感染的关键,但往往伴随着一些主机的重要组织(肝,肾,心,脑)的附带损害。如果不受控制的组织损伤,可能有致命的后果,如经常发生,例如,在严重的疟疾,严重脓毒症和其他可能的传染病。公差减少了感染和随后对宿主的免疫反应造成的有害影响。

虽然在植物的免疫力,耐受性感染研究的现象已经很大程度上被忽视了的哺乳动物,包括人类。虽然仍然有许多要学习如何以及在何种情况下的抗感染是由主机采用,目前已知的宿主防御战略背后的分子机制的大部分来自Gulbenkian的德Ciência研究所进行了工作米格尔·苏亚雷斯领导的小组。团队特别是在确定特定疾病的耐受性机制,一方面有兴趣,也宽容的一般策略,可能,可能的话,就业保护,前提未来感染的主机。

一般,因为是阻力,动物和人类研究中考虑的唯一机制,当主机capitulates感染往往是由于免疫系统发生故障。作者认为,这是情况并非总是如此,和下划线区分失败的抵抗的重要性和宽容失败,传染病的发病率和死亡率的原因。这种区别将决定治疗方法的选择。当首要问题是失败的宽容,然后刺激免疫系统,或管理的抗生素,可能是无效的。在这种情况下,提高耐受性,可能是​​更有效的打击感染,炎症和自身免疫性疾病。

(*)鲁斯兰Medzhitov,大卫·施耐德,米格尔·苏亚雷斯(2012年)作为国防战略的抗病性。科学335(6071):936-941
‹ 上一主题|下一主题
你需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

肝胆相照论坛

GMT+8, 2024-4-29 18:18 , Processed in 0.012886 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X1.5

© 2001-2010 Comsenz Inc.