- 现金
- 62111 元
- 精华
- 26
- 帖子
- 30437
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-5
- 最后登录
- 2022-12-28
|
本帖最后由 风雨不动 于 2012-4-14 14:54 编辑
Please read the following abstract with care. Management of HBV in pregnancy is complex:
For mothers:
1. Should mothers undergo treatment during her pregnancy for her own health?
For babies:
1. Should mothers have treatment before pregnancy?
2. Should mothers have treatment during early pregnancy when fetal development may be most easily affected?
3. Should mothers be treated in late pregnancy to further reduce risks of vertical transmission?
4. Is the drug safe for the unborn babies? Is the drug safe for breastfeeding babies?
[My personal opinions only. Always consult your doctors.StephenW]
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol.
2011 Jun 7. [Epub ahead of print]
Hepatitis B virus infection and pregnancy.
Pol S, Corouge M, Fontaine H.
Source
Inserm U-1016, unité d'hépatologie, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, hôpital
Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
Abstract
Pregnancy only mildly affects that natural progression of
acute and chronic infection by the hepatitis B virus (HBV) but it does
bring to light three important questions. Mother to child (vertical)
transmission risk is best prevented by mandatory HBs antigen testing in all
pregnant women in their second trimester and by systemic serovaccination of
newborns of infected mothers. In mothers with high viral load, vertical
infection in utero could be prevented by lamivudine, telbivudine or
tenofovir treatment. Invasive obstetric or gynecological procedures (such
as amniocentesis, forceps, etc.) do not seem to increase the risk of
vertical infection. Breastfeeding is not contraindicated in maternal HBV
infection after serovaccination of the newborn. This holds true for mothers
on active treatment with tenofovir which is not absorbed into breast milk.
When it comes to managing active antiviral treatment, in absence of
virosuppression with lamivudine, tenofovir remains a logical step-up
treatment; in absence of virosuppression with adefovir, tenofovir also
remains a logical step-up choice as do tenofovir/emtricitabine combinations
or lamivudine in absence of preexisting resistance which may have been
induced during combination treatment of adefovir and lamivudine. In cases
of effective virosuppression with treatment by analogues, lamivudine should
be continued and entecavir should eventually be replaced by lamivudine,
telbivudine or tenofovir; adefovir should be replaced by tenofovir or
lamivudine in absence of resistance (which would require tenofovir therapy)
or adefovir which would restrict lamivudine therapy.
Copyright © 2011
Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.PMID: 21659015 [PubMed - as
supplied by publisher]
(6.合.彩).足球.篮球...各类投注开户下注
第一投注.现金网:招代理年薪10万以上:6668.cc |
|