15/10/02说明:此前论坛服务器频繁出错,现已更换服务器。今后论坛继续数据库备份,不备份上传附件。

肝胆相照论坛

 

 

肝胆相照论坛 论坛 学术讨论& HBV English [英语,Cochrane评价]Phyllanthus species for chronic ...
查看: 674|回复: 3
go

[英语,Cochrane评价]Phyllanthus species for chronic hepatitis B virus infec [复制链接]

Rank: 8Rank: 8

现金
62111 元 
精华
26 
帖子
30441 
注册时间
2009-10-5 
最后登录
2022-12-28 

才高八斗

1
发表于 2011-4-22 04:27 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览 |打印
<http://www2.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab008960.html>

Phyllanthus species for chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Xia Y, Luo H, Liu JP, Gluud C


Summary
Phyllanthus species for chronic hepatitis B virus infection
Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection causes significant mortality,
morbidity, and economic burden worldwide. Although the current approved
therapies are effective, response to treatment is not satisfactory.
Patients are at high risk of developing viral resistance, and serious
adverse events occur. The objective of this review was to evaluate the
benefits and harms of phyllanthus species for patients with chronic HBV
infection. Phyllanthus species appear to be safe and may potentially have
effects on the clearance of viral markers in patients with HBV infection.
However, all of the trials evaluated in this review were of low methodology
quality, ie, have high risk of bias, and there was a risk of random errors
in the majority of comparisons. Furthermore, all analyses showed
substantial heterogeneity. Accordingly, randomised clinical trials with low
risk of bias and large sample size should be conducted to confirm the
effects of phyllanthus species before clinical use is considered.

This is a Cochrane review abstract and plain language summary, prepared
and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration, currently published in The
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011 Issue 4, Copyright © 2011 The
Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.. The full
text of the review is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464-780X).
This record should be cited as: Xia Y, Luo H, Liu JP, Gluud C. Phyllanthus
species for chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD008960. DOI:
10.1002/14651858.CD008960.pub2 Editorial Group: Hepato-Biliary Group This
version first published online: April 13. 2011 Last assessed as up-to-date:
October 31. 2010

Abstract

Background
Phyllanthus species for patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV)
infection have been assessed in clinical trials, but no consensus regarding
their usefulness exists.

Objectives
To evaluate the benefits and harms of phyllanthus species for patients with
chronic HBV infection.

Search strategy
Searches were performed in The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Gorup Controlled
Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials
(CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index
Expanded, and the Chinese Biomedical CD Database, China Network Knowledge
Information, Chinese Science Journal Database, TCM Online, and Wanfang
Database. Conference proceedings in Chinese were handsearched. All searches
were conducted until October 2010.

Selection criteria
Randomized clinical trials comparing phyllanthus species with placebo or no
intervention for patients with chronic HBV infection. Co-interventions were
allowed if all comparison groups had received the same co-interventions. We
included trials irrespective of blinding, publication status, or language.

Data collection and analysis
Two authors selected the trials and extracted the data independently. The
RevMan software was used for statistical analysis of dichotomous data with
risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Risk of bias was
assessed to control for systematic errors. Trial sequential analysis was
used in order to control for random errors.

Main results
A total of 16 randomised trials with 1326 patients were included. One trial
with 42 participants compared phyllanthus with placebo. The trial found no
significant difference in HBeAg seroconversion after the end of treatment
(RR 0.9; 95% CI 0.73 to 1.25) or follow-up (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.60).
No other outcomes could be assessed. Fifteen trials compared phyllanthus
plus an antiviral drug like interferon alpha, lamivudine, adefovir
dipivoxil, thymosin, vidarabine, or conventional treatment with the same
antiviral drug alone. Phyllanthus did significantly affect serum HBV DNA
(RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.91, P = 0.008; I2 = 71%), serum HBeAg (RR 0.70;
95% CI 0.60 to 0.81, P < 0.00001; I2 = 68%), and HBeAg seroconversion (RR
0.77; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.92, P = 0.005; I2 = 78%), but the heterogeneity was
substantial. The result obtained regarding serum HBV DNA was not supported
by trial sequential analysis. None of the trials reported mortality and
hepatitis B-related morbidity, quality of life, or liver histology. Only
two trials reported adverse events with numbers without significant
differences. No serious adverse events were reported.

Authors' conclusions
There is no convincing evidence that phyllanthus compared with placebo
benefits patients with chronic HBV infection. Phyllanthus plus an antiviral
drug may be better than the same antiviral drug alone. However,
heterogeneity, systematic errors, and random errors question the validity
of the results. Clinical trials with large sample size and low risk of bias
are needed to confirm our findings. Species of phyllanthus should be
reported in future trials, and a dose-finding design is warranted.

Rank: 8Rank: 8

现金
62111 元 
精华
26 
帖子
30441 
注册时间
2009-10-5 
最后登录
2022-12-28 

才高八斗

2
发表于 2011-4-22 04:32 |只看该作者
慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染余甘物种

夏Ÿ,罗红,刘JP,Gluud ç

综述
慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染余甘物种
慢性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染造成重大死亡,
发病率和世界各地的经济负担。虽然目前核准
治疗方法是有效的,对治疗的反应并不理想。
患者在抗病毒发展的高风险,严重
不良事件发生。本次审查的目的是评估
余甘物种的利益和损害为慢性乙肝患者
感染。余甘物种似乎是安全的,且有可能有
对在乙肝病毒感染患者病毒标志物清除。
然而,在本次审查评估试验方法均低
品质,即具有高风险的偏见,并有大量的随机错误的风险
在大部分的比较。此外,所有分析结果显示:
大量的异质性。因此,随机临床试验与低
大样本的偏差和风险的大小应进行确认
临床使用前余甘物种的影响是考虑。

这是一个抽象的Cochrane回顾总结和通俗易懂的语言编写
并保持Cochrane协作网目前在出版,
科克伦数据库系统评价2011年第4期,2011年版权所有©
Cochrane协作。出版由John Wiley和Sons有限公司。全
审查案文可在Cochrane图书馆(ISSN 1464 - 780X)。
该记录的引用应为:夏Ÿ,罗红,刘太平绅士,Gluud三余甘
种慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染。科克伦数据库
系统评价2011年第4期。艺术。编号:CD008960。分类号:
10.1002/14651858.CD008960.pub2编辑组:肝胆组该
版本首次发表时间:4月13日。 2011年最后评定为保持在日期:
10月31日。 2010年

摘要

背景
对于慢性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)患者余甘物种
评估了感染的临床试验,但没有共识
其效用存在。

目标
要评估病人的利益和种危害与叶下珠
慢性乙肝病毒感染。

检索策略
进行搜查,在Cochrane肝胆Gorup控制
试验注册中心注册的Cochrane对照试验
(中环)在Cochrane图书馆,数据库,文摘,科学引文索引
扩大,中国生物医学光盘数据库,中国网络知识
信息,中国科技期刊数据库,中医药在线和万芳
数据库。在汉语大会诉讼手工。所有的搜索
直到2010年10月进行。

选择标准
与安慰剂比较的随机或无余甘品种的临床试验
干预对慢性HBV感染者。联合干预措施
如果允许所有比较组已收到了同样的合作措施。我们
不论致盲,发布状态,或语言包括审判。

数据收集与分析
两位作者选择了试验和提取数据独立。该
RevMan软件是用于二元数据的统计分析
风险比(RR)和95%可信区间(CI)。风险是偏见
评估为控制系统误差。试用序列分析
使用,以控制随机误差。

主要结果
一对16个随机试验的1326例,共包括在内。一审判
与42个参加者与安慰剂相比余甘。该试验未发现
在HBeAg血清转换显着差异,在治疗结束后
(RR为0.9; 95%CI为0.73至1.25)或后续行动(RR为1.00; 95%CI为0.63至1.60)。
没有其他结果可以评估。余甘十五试验比较
再加上像干扰素α,拉米夫定,阿德福韦抗病毒药物
酯,胸腺肽,阿糖腺苷,或具有相同的常规治疗
抗病毒药物孤单。余甘没有显着影响血清HBV DNA
(RR为0.69; 95%CI为0.52〜0.91,P值0.008;碘= 71%),血清HBeAg(RR为0.70;
95%CI为0.60至0.81,磷“0.00001;碘= 68%)和HBeAg血清转化(率
0.77; 95%CI为0.63〜0.92,P值0.005;碘= 78%),但异质性
可观。所得结果对于血清HBV DNA不支持
通过试验序列分析。审判无报告死亡率和
B型肝炎有关的发病率,生活,或肝组织学的质量。只有
两个试验报告无明显不良反应与数字
差异。无严重不良事件的报告。

作者的结论
没有令人信服的证据表明,与安慰剂相比余甘
慢性HBV感染患者的好处。余甘加抗病毒
药物可能会比同抗病毒药物来得好。然而,
异质性,系统误差和随机误差的有效性问题
的结果。大样本量,不带偏见低风险的临床试验
来证实我们的发现。余甘品种应
报告在未来的审判,并呈剂量调查设计是有

Rank: 8Rank: 8

现金
5868 元 
精华
帖子
4497 
注册时间
2011-3-23 
最后登录
2020-7-19 

携手同心

3
发表于 2011-4-22 13:58 |只看该作者
翻译水平有待提高。不然看不懂英文的朋友基本很难理解文章大意。
---
至少文章结论 稍微人工修改一下,或用自己话概括一下。
--不然这个中文翻译没几个人看的懂。
论坛帖子仅供参考;请以国内外的hbv防治指南为准。1-hbv指南的第十点内容~抗病毒治疗的一般适应证http://www.hbvhbv.info/forum/thread-985003-1-1.html 2-骆抗先医生博文:http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/articlelist_1264734122_0_1.html  3-缪晓辉医生http://www.miaoxh.com 4-蔡晧东医生..

Rank: 8Rank: 8

现金
62111 元 
精华
26 
帖子
30441 
注册时间
2009-10-5 
最后登录
2022-12-28 

才高八斗

4
发表于 2011-4-22 15:38 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 StephenW 于 2011-4-22 15:39 编辑
lyq2003526 发表于 2011-4-22 13:58
翻译水平有待提高。不然看不懂英文的朋友基本很难理解文章大意。
---
至少文章结论 稍微人工修改一下,或用 ...

这是一个问题. 希望英语良好的读者帮忙啊.
‹ 上一主题|下一主题
你需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

肝胆相照论坛

GMT+8, 2024-5-15 10:07 , Processed in 0.017852 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X1.5

© 2001-2010 Comsenz Inc.