- 现金
- 62111 元
- 精华
- 26
- 帖子
- 30437
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-5
- 最后登录
- 2022-12-28
|
本帖最后由 StephenW 于 2011-9-27 13:58 编辑
studyforhope 在Medhelp上 回答 Rep 9AC问题:
[4est]:
Let assume that we have HbeAg negative, HbsAg suppress by Rep9Ac and DNA supress by antivirals. so, this is the best case for a chronic carrier (no e or s antigen for divert immune answer, no DNA means no new viruses), but also in this situation the cccDNA will remain in the liver cells. how this will be manage?
Can we assume that because we don't have s and e antigens the immune system will target the infected liver cells and destroy them ?
[studyforhope]:
That is the basic concept. In addition to the direct targeting by cd8 cytotoxic Tcells, the local phagocytosis of virions and debris from necrotic liver cells containing HBV proteins will allow presentation of the classII peptide epitopes on the surface of Macrophages and Kupffer cells to cd4 helperTcells in the liver, with a strong local cytokine response that will help in the noncytolytic clearance of hepatocytes fromm HBVcccDNA.
One problem is likely that the longstanding exhaustion of the s antigen specific T-cell clone repertoire (many many years of periphery flooding with e and s antigens) will require a substantial time frame of regeneration of this immune response, particularly in older patients and those with a longer chronic infection. Thus a longer supression of s-antigen release by REp 9AC might be necessary to allow targeted immune recovery in these patients.
Aside from protection against adaptive immune evasive epitope mutations by antivirals, it might also be advisable to accelerate the regeneration of the blunted adaptive immune response - TandB cells- by therapeutic vaccinations once the s-antigen is negative.
Regarding new developments on the horizon, there is a therapeutic HBV vaccine by Dynavax, that could be used eg in the context above. Replicor and Myrcludex remain the most promising partial attack modes against HBV at this moment.
The liver concentrating tenofovir would be a great element of progress, since reduction in antiviral toxicity is a major concern, consdering the need for long term use.
Nitazoxanide thus far - see Stefs progress reports- seems to be of weak effectiveness, at least at the dosing that is low enough for comfort.
Substances like squalamine might be virus propagation blocking to a certain degree, but the effect on the reduction of the cccDNA hepatocyte population is unlikely to be better than the one with antivirals. It is too early to make any specific predictions. |
|