- 现金
- 62111 元
- 精华
- 26
- 帖子
- 30437
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-5
- 最后登录
- 2022-12-28
|
本帖最后由 StephenW 于 2011-8-24 13:02 编辑
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06828.x/pdf
Nucleot(s)ide analogues to prevent perinatal transmission of HBV: Lamivudine is effective but Tenofovir may be better.
J LAWLER,1 A GLASS,1 U CHATTERJEE,2 E WISEMAN,1
S DAVISON,1 S MANOHARAN,2 L SMITH,1 A YEO,3
A AYRES,4 S LOCARNINI,4 MT LEVY1
1 Department Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Liverpool Hospital, 2 University of New South Wales,
Sydney, 3 Ingham Research Institute, 4 Victorian
Infectious Disease Reference Laboratory
Perinatal transmission of HBV still occurs despite passive/active immune prophylaxis. We have previously reported a vertical transmission rate approaching 10% in mothers with viral loads above HBV DNA log8
copies/mL (∼/=log7 IU/mL). Lamivudine in the last trimester may reduce this risk. The efficacy of Tenofovir has not been proven.
Aim
To examine the impact of Lamivudine and Tenofovir used in the last trimester of pregnancy.
Methods
We conducted a prospective opt-in study of pregnant women with a high viral load. Women were offered Lamivudine commencing at 32 weeks gestation and more recently Tenofovir. We compared viral load response between Lamivudine and Tenofovir. Viral load quantitation was performed prior to treatment and at delivery (or within two weeks).
Perinatal transmission was assessed at 9 months of age.
Results
44 women were treated with Lamivudine, 8 women were treated with Tenofovir and 15 women opted out serving as controls. Virological assessments at both baseline and delivery were available for 25 Lamivudine treated mothers and 6 Tenofovir treated mothers. There was no significant difference in median baseline viral load between treatment groups [Lamivudine: 170,000,000 IU/mL (95%CI: 71,000,000–248,000,000);
Tenofovir: 60,200,0000 IU/mL (95%CI: 654,000–170,000,000), p = 0.14].
The median end-of-treatment viral load was significantly lower in the Tenofovir group [Lamivudine: 234,000 IU/mL (95%CI: 149,000–682,000); Tenofovir: 16,450 IU/mL (95%CI: 5,080–86,000), p = 0.0087].
Median duration of therapy (50 vs 63.5 days) was not significantly different (p = 0.15). End-of-treatment HBV DNA was >log7 IU/mL in 5/25 mothers treated with Lamivudine versus 0/6 in the Tenofovir group. 2/7
control group babies tested HBsAg positive compared with 0/27 babies from the Lamivudine treated group (p = 0.04). No baby has reached 9 months of age in the Tenofovir group.
Conclusions
Lamivudine is effective but failed to achieve adequate viral suppression in 20% of women treated. We hypothesise a role for transplacental transfer of drug which has a protective effect at the time of birth exposure. Tenofovir provides more effective viral load reduction and may be a superior choice.
|
|