15/10/02说明:此前论坛服务器频繁出错,现已更换服务器。今后论坛继续数据库备份,不备份上传附件。

肝胆相照论坛

 

 

肝胆相照论坛 论坛 学术讨论& HBV English 存档 1 HBeAg阴性患者长期阿地治疗比拉米要更省钱(56 AASLD) ...
查看: 1487|回复: 4

HBeAg阴性患者长期阿地治疗比拉米要更省钱(56 AASLD) [复制链接]

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

现金
3700 元 
精华
16 
帖子
1790 
注册时间
2002-12-9 
最后登录
2021-4-14 

旺旺勋章 大财主勋章 如鱼得水 黑煤窑矿工勋章

1
发表于 2005-11-17 06:22

Long-term Treatment with Adefovir Dipivoxil Is More Cost Effective Than Lamivudine for HBeAg-negative Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B

The aim of the present study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of long-term therapy with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) [Hepsera] or lamivudine (LAM) [Epivir-HBV] as therapies for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

A decision analysis model has been designed for a panel of experts to perform a cost effectiveness analysis of LAM (100 mg/daily) and ADV (10 mg/daily) over three years of therapy.

Data for each strategy were obtained from published clinical trials. Virological response was defined by undetectable HBV DNA. The study was performed from the perspective of the Spanish Public Health System considering the following direct health costs (in US$): drug acquisition, visits, diagnostic or laboratory tests to determine virologic response and HBV drug resistance

Results

The following table shows the results of the base-case analysis (with a 3% annual discount for costs):

The costs associated with three years therapy with ADV were 2.2 times greater than those of LAM. Virological response achieved with ADV was 2.5 times greater than that of LAM.

Despite the higher costs associated with ADV, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ADV versus LAM was lower than the average cost-effectiveness ratios of ADV or LAM. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the model, being the response to ADV and LAM at year 3 the factors that most influence the cost-effectiveness.

[The authors conclude] 揕ong-term treatment with ADV is a cost-effective strategy in patients with chronic HBeAg-negative hepatitis. Therefore, adefovir dipivoxil should be used as a first line treatment due to the high percentage of virological response obtained at year 3 and because its cost per responding patient is lower than that of LAM.?/span>

11/16/05

Reference
M Buti and others. LONG-TERM TREATMENT WITH ADEFOVIR DIPIVOXIL IS MORE COSTEFFECTIVE THAN LAMIVUDINE FOR HBeAg-NEGATIVE PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEPATITIS B. Abstract 400. Program and Abstracts of the 56th annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. November 11-15, 2005. LACE w:st="on">San Francisco, CALACE>.

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-11-16 16:24:22编辑过]

http://www.medhelp.org/user_photos/show/154916?personal_page_id=1697291

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

现金
8479 元 
精华
帖子
2890 
注册时间
2002-8-18 
最后登录
2007-6-27 

荣誉之星

2
发表于 2005-11-17 13:06
谁能简要翻译一下?
世界卫生组织把“健康”定义为“躯体的、心理的以及社会适应的良好状态”。 推崇科学,破除迷信!允许宗教信仰自由,反对荒谬迷信观点,支持探索气功强身健体,反对伪科学误导战友。 丰富的营养、充足的休息、适度的运动。

Rank: 4

现金
538 元 
精华
帖子
74 
注册时间
2005-7-29 
最后登录
2006-11-14 
3
发表于 2005-11-21 11:22

楼主肯定是博士.

[em07][em07]

Rank: 5Rank: 5

现金
3585 元 
精华
帖子
727 
注册时间
2004-10-27 
最后登录
2017-1-11 
4
发表于 2005-11-23 03:00

建议发全英文的人给个简单的中文摘要,毕竟不是每个人有耐心看大段的E文的

Rank: 4

现金
786 元 
精华
帖子
268 
注册时间
2004-6-3 
最后登录
2009-1-14 
5
发表于 2005-11-23 13:13

用Adefovir Dipivoxil长期治疗HBeAg阴性的慢性乙型肝炎病人
比Lamivudine性价比更高

本研究的目标将估计用adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) [Hepsera]lamivudine (LAM) [Epivir-HBV]长期治疗HBeAg阴性慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)病人的成本效益。

专家小组设计了一个决策分析模型:分析用LAM (100毫克/每日)和ADV(10个毫克/每日)三年治疗期间的成本效益

两种疗法的数据都是从公布的临床试验中得到的。 HBVDNA检测不到为滤过性反应。 本研究是从西班牙公共卫生系统考虑[下列] (Sciences)[以下] (General)">下列直接健康费用(US$)的角度出发 : 药物购买、访问、诊断或者实验室试验来确定滤过性反应和HBV药物作用

结果

下表显示了基本案例分析的结果(每年3%费用贴现)

ADV三年治疗费用大于LAM 2.2倍。 ADV 获得的滤过性反应大于LAM2.5倍。

尽管用ADV需要更高的费用,但ADV vs LAM的增量成本效益比要低于ADV或LAM平均成本效益比。 灵敏度分析展示了设计模型是可靠的,可以反映ADV和LAM三年来影响成本效益的大部分因素。

[作者结论]用ADV长期治疗HBeAg阴性慢性肝炎病人是一个有效方法。 由于三年获得滤过性反应的高百分比,因此每名获得滤过性反应的患者治疗费用低于LAM,所以,应该使用adefovir dipivoxil作为一种一线药物用于慢性乙肝治疗.

‹ 上一主题|下一主题

肝胆相照论坛

GMT+8, 2024-10-7 09:23 , Processed in 0.014703 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X1.5

© 2001-2010 Comsenz Inc.