肝胆相照论坛

标题: [ISVHLD2012]乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎的治疗性疫苗和预防性疫苗 [打印本页]

作者: StephenW    时间: 2012-6-26 07:36     标题: [ISVHLD2012]乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎的治疗性疫苗和预防性疫苗

[ISVHLD2012]乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎的治疗性疫苗和预防性疫苗——Prof.Matti Sallberg 专访
                 作者:Matti.Sallberg 时间:2012-6-21 15:28:51 点击:93    加入收藏 关键字:乙型肝炎 丙型肝炎 疫苗
                                
                  Hepatology Digest: Your presentation is on vaccines for the treatment of HBV and HCV. What is a therapeutic vaccine? As I understand it, one of the major problems with a person who has contracted hepatitis B for instance, is that they don’t get an appropriate T cell response. How is a therapeutic vaccine going to give them an appropriate T cell response?
  Dr Sallberg: It’s a great question and very relevant. The liver is a highly effective tolerogen; it is not supposed to produce any antigens or proteins that are going to raise an immune response because that causes liver disease. The liver has a very important regulatory role in shutting down T cells. That is why activation of T cells inside the liver is not that frequent. In chronic HBV the T cells are polarized, and in chronic HCV the T cells are dysfunctional. So what is needed is an appropriate activation of T cells outside the liver and that is why the crucial thing when you perform a therapeutic vaccination is that you have the correct antigen so the T cells are as healthy as possible. Secondly, the local environment where you activate the T cells should be highly immunogenic. You should have the correct host immunomodulation; you should have the correct cytokine environment. It is the mix of all these things which is why we can in several different animal models, break immunological tolerance. For example, in hepatitis B, there is a tremendous amount of viral antigen produced during the infection. Most of these antigens and particularly the surface antigens are secreted into the circulation and an antigen in the circulation is highly effective in dampening or inhibiting a T cell response. If you give another antigen, for example a core antigen or something that is not secreted, when you treat the patient with antivirals, the antigens disappear from the liver which alleviates the pressure on the T cells from these antigens and they can become immunogenic. One would think that the concept of therapeutic vaccination is something that has never been tested but actually we have used it for over fifty years in the treatment of allergies which is exactly what this is. It’s called hypersensitization but it is actually a therapeutic vaccination.
  
  Hepatology Digest: So if you start introducing core antigens that something like entecavir is already reducing so that the core antigens are not suppressing T cells so much, won’t you be worsening the problem with more core antigens?
  Dr Sallberg: That is the key. You put them in a different place. You introduce the core antigens at a highly immunogenic site. For example, you can give it in the skin; you can give it intramuscularly together with different adjuvants; you can give it as a genetic immunogen. But the key thing is that you give it outside of the liver where there will be a local production of a good proinflammatory immune response so there will be production of gamma-interferon and interleukin-12. Then there will be an activation of an antiviral immune response itself. Both HBV and HCV have a tendency to promote anti-inflammatory responses producing interleukin-10 or interleukin-4 which suppresses the antiviral response. In contrast, what you want to activate is called the T helper 1 cell (Th1) response with gamma-interferon promoting activation of cytotoxic T cells and so forth.
  
  Hepatology Digest: So if you put this into a site where there is not a lot of antigen of what you are putting in and at manageable levels, it can launch an antiviral response as opposed to response suppression? So not only are we talking about dividing patient outcomes into individualized medicine but we are also compartmentalizing the body further as well.
  Dr Sallberg: Exactly. That is perfectly true. If you have an infection and that infection itself is not immunogenic enough under the conditions that are present, then you can give a similar antigen (usually a modified version of the same antigen) and if you give it in the correct way, you will get immune activation.
  
  Hepatology Digest: Most of the therapeutic vaccines that have been tried have not been particularly successful. I believe there is only one in phase III. What is the current status of therapeutic vaccines?
  Dr Sallberg: You are right. If we are talking about hepatitis B then I don’t think there has been any vaccine that has been successful yet. I think that is because in hepatitis B the load of antigen is so high that you really need to suppress virus production very effectively for at least six months to a year. That we can now do with the new drugs, entecavir and tenofovir. The old drugs such as lamivudine were not potent enough in suppressing antigen production unlike with the new drugs. So I think combinations with the new drugs will be a very good base for therapeutic vaccines. In hepatitis C, there are at least three vaccines that have reached phase II: the Transgene MVA-based vaccine who have recently issued press releases that combination of standard of care which in that case is interferon and ribavirin, increases the rapid response rate early in therapy which suggests that it should also increase cure rates; Globeimmune, who have shown that they can increase cure rates by 10%-15%; and then there is the vaccine that I have been participating in developing with a Swedish company called ChronTech. That is a DNA-based vaccine that we give with electroporation. We have seen the same that when we combine vaccination and then starting patients on standard of care, you increase the cure rate. So there is no solid evidence but there are a number of small studies now coming out showing that there may be a clear beneficial clinical effect of therapeutic vaccine. Even though the concept of therapeutic vaccines has been around for decades, it is only now that we are starting to see some clinically beneficial effects.
  
  Hepatology Digest: In your abstract you mention that the role for therapeutic vaccines in HCV is in combination with DAAs to replace interferon or ribavirin, but the data you are talking about is in combination with standard of care. Why are we only using them with interferon and ribavirin right now?
  Dr Sallberg: Unfortunately, you have to use the drugs that are available. The development of the therapeutic vaccines began before the DAAs became available so that is why all of the studies that started two or three years ago have been conducted with interferon and ribavirin. The exciting studies will involve the immune-modulating and immune-activating effects of the vaccine as the new mechanism of action in combination with the direct-acting antivirals. So there will be a completely complementary mechanism of action to those drugs and hopefully we are not going to have side effects as you do have interferon which is an immunomodulatory drug. Ribavirin may or may not be an immunomodulatory drug. Conceptually I think it is very attractive combining the DAAs with the vaccine. I also think the recent failures in the hard-to-treat patients suggest that we most likely will need some immune-activating component in a highly effective HCV therapy.

作者: StephenW    时间: 2012-6-26 07:38

[ISVHLD2012]乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎的治疗性疫苗和预防性疫苗 - 的马蒂Sallberg教授专访
作者:Matti.Sallberg时间:2012-6-21 15时28分51秒点击:93加入收藏关键字:乙型肝炎丙型肝炎疫苗

肝病:你的演讲是为治疗乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎的疫苗。什么是治疗性疫苗?据我了解,与已签约例如B型肝炎的人存在的主要问题之一,是他们没有得到适当的T细胞反应。治疗性疫苗是如何给他们一个适当的T细胞反应?
Sallberg博士:这是一个伟大的问题非常相关。肝脏是的高效tolerogen;它是不应该产生任何抗原或蛋白质会提高免疫反应,因为这会导致肝脏疾病。肝脏有在关停T细胞非常重要的调节作用。这就是为什么肝脏内T细胞的激活是不是频繁。慢性乙型肝炎T细胞极化,慢性丙型肝炎病毒的T细胞功能失调。所以我们需要的是适当激活T细胞,肝外,这就是为什么当你进行治疗性疫苗是关键的东西,你有正确的抗原,使T细胞是尽可能健康。其次,当地的环境,让您激活T细胞应该是具有高度免疫原性。你应该有正确的主机免疫调节,你应该有正确的细胞因子环境。它是所有这些东西,这就是为什么我们可以在几个不同的动物模型,打破免疫耐受的组合。例如,在B型肝炎,有大量的感染过程中产生病毒抗原。这些抗原,尤其是表面抗原分泌进入血液循环,在循环抗原是非常有效的抑制或抑制T细胞的反应。如果你给另外一个抗原,核心抗原或不分泌的东西,例如,当你与抗病毒药物的病人治疗,抗原消失从肝缓解从这些抗原的T细胞上的压力,他们可以成为免疫。人会认为,治疗性疫苗的概念是什么,从来没有被测试,但实际上我们已经使用五十多年来,它在治疗过敏性疾病,这是什么,这正是。它被称为超敏感,但它实际上是一种治疗性疫苗。

肝病:所以如果你开始引入核心抗原,如恩替卡韦的东西已经减少,使核心抗原是不是这么多抑制T细胞,会不会你会与更多的核心抗原的问题恶化?
医生Sallberg:这是关键。你把他们在不同的地方。在高度免疫原性的网站,你介绍的核心抗原。例如,你可以给它在皮肤上,你可以给它不同佐剂肌肉注射一起,你可以给它作为一种遗传性免疫。但关键的一点是,你给肝脏外,那里将是一个良好的炎性免疫反应的本地生产,所以会有γ-干扰素和白细胞介素12的生产。然后会有一个激活的抗病毒免疫反应本身。乙型肝炎病毒和丙型肝炎病毒有一种倾向,促进抗炎反应,产生白细胞介素10白细胞介素-4抑制抗病毒反应。相反,你要激活被称为辅助性T细胞(TH1)与γ-干扰素促进细胞毒性T细胞的活化等等的反应。

肝病:所以,如果你把一个网站,那里是不是很多,你的投入和管理水平的抗原,它可以启动抗病毒反应,反应抑制反对呢?因此,我们不仅谈论分成个性化药物的患者的治疗效果,但我们也进一步区划的身体以及。
医生Sallberg:没错。这是完全正确的。如果你有一个感染,感染本身是不足够的条件下,目前免疫原性,那么你可以提供一个类似的抗原(通常是相同​​的抗原修改后的版本),如果你给它以正确的方式,你会得到免疫激活。

肝病:已经尝试过的治疗性疫苗的大多数人都没有特别成功。我相信只有在第三阶段。什么是治疗性疫苗的当前状态?
Sallberg博士:你说得对。如果我们谈论的是乙肝,那么我不认为有任何疫苗已经成功还。我认为这是因为在B型肝炎抗原负载是如此之高,你真的需要非常有效地抑制病毒至少6个月到一年的生产。我们现在可以做新的药物,恩替卡韦和替诺福韦。不老药,如拉米夫定不像新的药物,抑制抗原生产足够有力。因此,我认为新的药物组合治疗性疫苗将是一个非常良好的基础。在C型肝炎,有至少三个已达到第二阶段的疫苗:最近发出新闻稿,结合标准的护理在这种情况下,是干扰素和利巴韦林的转基因基于MVA的疫苗,提高快速反应率,早在治疗,这表明它也应该提高治愈率; Globeimmune,已经表明,他们可以增加10%-15%的治愈率;再有就是,我一直在参与发展称为ChronTech一家瑞典公司的疫苗。这是一种基于DNA的疫苗,我们给电。我们已经看到了同样的,当我们结合疫苗,然后开始标准对护理的病人,可以增加治愈率。因此,有没有确凿的证据,但也有一些小的研究,现在走出来显示可能有一个明确的有益的治疗性疫苗的临床效果。即使几十年来一直围绕治疗性疫苗的概念,它是唯一的,现在我们开始看到一些临床有益的影响。

肝病:你在你的抽象提到,DAAS相结合,以取代干扰素或利巴韦林在丙型肝炎治疗性疫苗的作用,但你正在谈论的数据是护理标准的结合。为什么我们只用干扰素和利巴韦林现在他们的权利吗?
博士Sallberg:不幸的是,你必须使用可用的药物。治疗性疫苗的开发开始之前成为DAAS所以这就是为什么所有的研究,两三年前开始已与干扰素和利巴韦林进行。令人兴奋的研究将涉及疫苗的免疫调节和免疫激活作用,作为直接作用抗病毒药物相结合的新机制与行动。所以这些药物的行动将是一个完全互补的机制,并希望我们不会有副作用,你这是一种免疫调节药物有干扰素。利巴韦林可能或可能不会是一种免疫调节药物。从概念上讲,我认为与疫苗相结合的DAAS,它是非常有吸引力。我也觉得难以治疗的患者在最近的失败表明,我们最有可能需要在一个非常有效的治疗丙型肝炎病毒的免疫激活组件。
作者: 咬牙硬挺    时间: 2012-6-26 23:35

感谢分享




欢迎光临 肝胆相照论坛 (http://hbvhbv.info/forum/) Powered by Discuz! X1.5